NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
vs
AMD Radeon R9 M380

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M380
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile R9 M380 Diferença
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile AMD Radeon R9 M380
Preço € 770.9 € 945.1 174.2 (23%)
Ano 2017 2015 2 (0%)
Temperatura máxima gravada 65C 70C 5 (8%)
Max ruído do ventilador 45dB 51.6dB 6.6 (15%)
Fonte de alimentação recomendada 75W 75W 0 (0%)
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz ($334.99) *closest mobile equivalent* Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99) *closest mobile equivalent*
Impacto da CPU no FPS +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
Impacto da CPU em FPS% 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
Configurações de qualidade de benchmark Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Desempenho médio de 1080p 34.4 FPS 28.7 FPS 5.7 (17%)
Desempenho médio 1440p 24.9 FPS 20.7 FPS 4.2 (17%)
Desempenho médio de 4K 14.5 FPS 11.7 FPS 2.8 (19%)
Memória 4 GB 4 GB 0 (0%)
Custo de 1080p por quadro € 22.4 € 32.9 10.5 (47%)
Custo 1440p por quadro € 31.0 € 45.7 14.7 (47%)
Custo 4K por quadro € 53.2 € 80.8 27.6 (52%)
popover.html 36/100 33/100 3 (8%)
Nosso veredicto: A atualização R9 M380 de GTX 1050 Ti Mobile para não é recomendada, pois é menos de 30% de melhoria no desempenho. Em geral, uma atualização razoável é entre 30% e 50% ou mais para justificar a compra de novo hardware. A relação preço/desempenho é muito melhor para GTX 1050 Ti Mobile .

Desempenho do jogo em configurações de qualidade selecionadas

Alterar configurações de qualidade

1920x1080

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M380
Ano Jogo Frames por segundo
2019 Apex Legends
27
30.6
22
25.2
2019 Anthem
17
19.7
14
16.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
26
28.9
21
23.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
37
41.8
29
32.8
2019 Metro Exodus
16
18.6
13
14.6
2019 World War Z
30
34.3
28
31.5
2019 Gears of War 5
24
27.1
19
21.2
2019 F1 2019
30
33.9
23
26.6
2019 GreedFall
27
30.6
21
24.0
2019 Borderlands 3
19
21.5
15
16.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
37
41.3
29
32.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
14
15.9
11
12.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
22
25.0
17
19.6
2018 Forza Horizon 4
28
31.6
23
26.6
2018 Fallout 76
32
36.5
27
30.1
2018 Hitman 2
26
28.9
21
23.8
2018 Just Cause 4
24
26.9
18
21.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
26
29.0
20
22.8
2018 Strange Brigade
39
43.6
30
34.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21
23.5
20
22.4
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
28
31.8
23
26.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
33
37.2
26
29.3
2017 For Honor
44
49.6
35
39.0
2017 Project CARS 2
31
35.2
24
27.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
38
42.7
30
33.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
22
24.6
20
22.3
2016 Hitman
39
44.0
32
35.9
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
34
38.1
29
32.3
2016 The Division
28
32.2
24
27.0
2016 Overwatch
44
49.3
37
41.2
2016 Dishonored 2
23
25.7
18
20.2
2015 DiRT Rally
45
50.9
41
46.5
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
25
27.8
23
26.2
2015 The Witcher 3
25
28.2
22
25.0
2015 Rocket League
130
144.9
102
113.7
2015 Need For Speed
36
40.1
28
31.5
2015 Project CARS
34
38.5
27
30.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
63
70.4
49
55.2
2013 Crysis 3
28
32.0
25
28.2
2013 Battlefield 4
33
37.6
30
34.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
89
99.3
70
78.0
2009 League of Legends
167
186.3
131
146.2

2560x1440

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M380
Ano Jogo Frames por segundo
2019 Apex Legends
18
22.8
15
18.8
2019 Anthem
12
15.6
10
12.9
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
17
22.4
14
18.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
22
28.1
17
22.1
2019 Metro Exodus
11
14.5
9
11.3
2019 World War Z
20
25.1
18
23.0
2019 Gears of War 5
15
19.6
12
15.4
2019 F1 2019
19
24.0
15
18.9
2019 GreedFall
17
22.1
13
17.3
2019 Borderlands 3
12
15.1
9
11.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
23
29.7
18
23.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
10
13.0
8
10.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
15
19.6
12
15.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
21
26.5
17
22.4
2018 Hitman 2
14
18.7
12
15.4
2018 Just Cause 4
15
19.9
12
15.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
16
20.3
12
15.9
2018 Strange Brigade
24
30.4
19
23.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
14
17.8
13
16.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
16
20.7
13
17.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
21
26.9
16
21.1
2017 For Honor
23
29.0
18
22.8
2017 Project CARS 2
19
24.8
15
19.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
30
38.5
24
30.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
18
22.9
16
20.6
2016 Hitman
25
31.3
21
27.0
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
20
26.0
17
22.0
2016 The Division
18
23.3
16
20.0
2016 Overwatch
27
33.9
22
28.4
2016 Dishonored 2
17
21.9
13
17.2
2015 DiRT Rally
28
35.5
25
32.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
15
19.4
14
18.7
2015 The Witcher 3
16
20.8
15
18.8
2015 Rocket League
49
62.1
38
48.7
2015 Need For Speed
24
31.0
19
24.4
2015 Project CARS
23
29.4
18
23.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
36
45.6
28
35.7
2013 Crysis 3
15
19.4
14
17.8
2013 Battlefield 4
19
24.5
17
22.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
66
82.8
52
65.0
2009 League of Legends
82
103.5
64
81.2

3840x2160

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 M380
Ano Jogo Frames por segundo
2019 Apex Legends
9
13.6
7
11.2
2019 Anthem
5
8.5
4
7.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
8
11.9
6
9.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
9
13.9
7
10.9
2019 Metro Exodus
6
9.1
4
7.1
2019 World War Z
10
14.5
9
13.2
2019 Gears of War 5
8
12.4
6
9.7
2019 F1 2019
10
15.3
8
12.0
2019 GreedFall
6
9.1
4
7.1
2019 Borderlands 3
5
7.8
4
6.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
12
17.8
9
13.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
5
8.3
4
6.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
8
12.4
6
9.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
12
17.8
10
14.7
2018 Hitman 2
7
11.0
6
9.1
2018 Just Cause 4
7
10.4
5
8.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
6
9.7
5
7.6
2018 Strange Brigade
11
16.5
9
13.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
7
10.2
6
9.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
7
11.1
6
9.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
13
18.6
10
14.6
2017 For Honor
10
14.5
7
11.3
2017 Project CARS 2
14
20.7
11
16.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
22
32.3
17
25.3
2016 Overwatch
12
17.5
10
14.7
2016 Dishonored 2
12
17.4
9
13.6
2015 Rocket League
20
29.0
15
22.7
2015 Need For Speed
14
20.7
11
16.2
2015 Project CARS
14
20.7
11
16.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
14
21.1
11
16.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
52
74.5
40
58.5
2009 League of Legends
28
41.4
22
32.5
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs R9 M380 with i7-6700K vs i7-4790K at 1080p and ultra vs ultra settings
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs R9 M380 with i7-6700K vs i7-4790K at 1440p and ultra vs ultra settings
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs R9 M380 with i7-6700K vs i7-4790K at 4K and ultra vs ultra settings

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile / i7-6700K

Em termos de custo, preços claramente é uma questão genuína aqui eo preço GTX 1050 Ti Mobile é simplesmente ridículo. Com relação à temperatura máxima da carga, GTX 1050 Ti Mobile refrigerar do ' s é excelente em mantê-lo fresco e o controle. Com MB 4096 RAM atual, o GTX 1050 Ti Mobile pode ter muito poucos gargalos relacionados à memória em jogos mais modernos.

adsense-leader.html

AMD Radeon R9 M380 / i7-4790K

Em termos de custo, preços claramente é uma questão genuína aqui eo preço R9 M380 é simplesmente ridículo. Com MB 4096 RAM atual, o R9 M380 pode ter muito poucos gargalos relacionados à memória em jogos mais modernos.

setupad-728x90.html

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile vs R9 M380 Specifications Comparison

Board Design

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile R9 M380
OutputsNo outputsNo outputs
TDP75 Wunknown

Clock Speeds

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile R9 M380
Boost Clock1620 MHz1000 MHz
GPU Clock1493 MHz900 MHz
Memory Clock1752 MHz 7008 MHz effective1500 MHz 6000 MHz effective

Graphics Card

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile R9 M380
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 10 MobileCrystal System (R9 M300)
ProductionActiveActive
Release DateFeb 1st, 2017May 5th, 2015

Graphics Features

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile R9 M380
DirectX12.0 (12_1)12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL1.22.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.46.3
Vulkan1.1.1031.1.101

Graphics Processor

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile R9 M380
ArchitecturePascalGCN 2.0
Die Size200 mm²160 mm²
FoundryTSMCTSMC
GPU NameGP106Strato
Process Size16 nm28 nm
Transistors4,400 million2,080 million

Memory

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile R9 M380
Bandwidth112.1 GB/s96.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit128 bit
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5

Render Config

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile R9 M380
L1 Cache48 KB (per SM)16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB
ROPs3216
Shading Units768768
TMUs4848

Theoretical Performance

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile R9 M380
FP32 (float) performance2.488 TFLOPS1.536 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance77.76 GFLOPS (1:32)109.7 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate51.84 GPixel/s16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate77.76 GTexel/s48.00 GTexel/s

Discussão e Comentários

Compartilhe seus comentários