R7 370 dengan i7-4790K benchmark di Kualitas ultra pengaturan kualitas

R7 370 Lebih cocok untuk membangun PC anggaran dan kurang menuntut permainan. Harga/kinerja rasio sangat baik untuk R7 370 terhadap persaingan dalam anggaran kartu grafis. Dengan arus 2048 MB RAM, R7 370 dapat memiliki kemacetan yang berhubungan dengan memori serius dalam permainan yang lebih modern. Dengan arus 2048 MB RAM, R7 370 dapat memiliki sangat sedikit kemacetan yang berhubungan dengan memori dalam permainan yang lebih modern.

 R7 370 dengan i7-4790K benchmark di Kualitas ultra pengaturan kualitas
AMD Radeon R7 370
Harga ₨ 2,945,230.7
Tahun 2015
Maksimum tercatat suhu 69C
Suara kipas Max 56.3dB
Direkomendasikan Power Supply 460W
Patokan CPU Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
CPU dampak pada FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU dampak pada FPS % 0.0%
Pengaturan kualitas patokan Ultra Quality Settings
Rata-rata 1080p kinerja 30.6 FPS
Rata-rata 1440p kinerja 20.8 FPS
Rata-rata 4K kinerja 12.5 FPS
Memori 2 GB
Biaya 1080p Per Bingkai ₨ 71,006.3
Biaya 1440p Per Bingkai ₨ 104,395.3
Biaya 4K Per Bingkai ₨ 173,797.8
Seri R7 370
popover.html 62/100 Bagus

R9 380 mungkin menjadi flagship high-end dari set GCN 1.0 kartu grafis terbaru, tetapi harganya membuat mereka jauh dari jangkauan sebagian besar mid-range gamer PC. Di sisi lain, R7 370 lebih dekat untuk terjangkau dengan label ₨ 2172472.2. AMD 's xx70 kartu selalu ditentukan oleh harga mid-range dengan kinerja yang mengetuk pintu high-end kartu grafis - terutama ketika overclock. Setelah meluangkan waktu untuk menguji sepenuhnya kartu grafis GCN 1.0 di dalam R7 370, kita dapat mengatakan tanpa ragu bahwa itu melanjutkan tren.

R7 370 jauh lebih murah daripada R9 270 karena biayanya ₨ 2172472.2. Bandingkan ini dengan R9 270, yang awalnya dengan harga ₨ 2609882.7. Sementara itu, NVIDIA kartu setara terdekat adalah GTX 760 yang harganya ₨ 3630507.2.

Permainan kinerja di Kualitas ultra pengaturan

Mengubah pengaturan kualitas

Resolusi 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2019 Apex Legends
24
27.0
2019 Anthem
15
17.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
22
25.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
30
34.2
2019 Metro Exodus
13
15.3
2019 World War Z
36
40.0
2019 Gears of War 5
19
22.2
2019 F1 2019
25
27.9
2019 GreedFall
22
25.1
2019 Borderlands 3
15
17.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
30
33.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
11
13.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
18
20.5
2018 Forza Horizon 4
22
25.0
2018 Fallout 76
26
29.0
2018 Hitman 2
20
23.0
2018 Just Cause 4
19
22.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
21
23.7
2018 Strange Brigade
32
35.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
33
37.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
22
25.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
27
30.5
2017 For Honor
36
40.7
2017 Project CARS 2
25
28.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
31
34.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
18
20.1
2016 Hitman
26
29.1
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
26
29.9
2016 The Division
24
27.6
2016 Overwatch
35
39.2
2016 Dishonored 2
18
21.0
2015 DiRT Rally
47
52.5
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
25
28.4
2015 The Witcher 3
21
23.9
2015 Total War: Attila
19
21.5
2015 Rocket League
106
118.7
2015 Need For Speed
29
32.9
2015 Project CARS
28
31.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
51
57.6
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
34
38.2
2014 Far Cry 4
37
42.2
2014 GRID Autosport
47
53.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
34
38.3
2014 The Talos Principle
42
47.2
2013 Crysis 3
26
29.0
2013 Battlefield 4
36
40.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
73
81.4
2009 League of Legends
137
152.6

Resolusi 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2019 Apex Legends
16
20.1
2019 Anthem
11
13.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
15
19.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
18
23.1
2019 Metro Exodus
9
11.9
2019 World War Z
23
29.2
2019 Gears of War 5
12
16.1
2019 F1 2019
15
19.7
2019 GreedFall
14
18.1
2019 Borderlands 3
9
12.4
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
19
24.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
8
10.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
12
16.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
16
21.0
2018 Hitman 2
12
15.0
2018 Just Cause 4
13
16.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
13
16.6
2018 Strange Brigade
19
24.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
22
28.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
12
16.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
17
22.0
2017 For Honor
18
23.7
2017 Project CARS 2
16
20.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
25
31.5
2016 Overwatch
21
27.3
2016 Dishonored 2
14
18.0
2015 Rocket League
40
50.8
2015 Need For Speed
20
25.4
2015 Project CARS
19
24.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
29
37.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
54
67.8
2009 League of Legends
67
84.8

Resolusi 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2019 Apex Legends
8
12.0
2019 Anthem
5
7.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
7
10.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
11.4
2019 Metro Exodus
5
7.5
2019 World War Z
11
16.8
2019 Gears of War 5
7
10.2
2019 F1 2019
8
12.5
2019 GreedFall
5
7.5
2019 Borderlands 3
4
6.4
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
10
14.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
4
6.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
7
10.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
9
14.0
2018 Hitman 2
6
9.0
2018 Just Cause 4
5
8.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
8.0
2018 Strange Brigade
9
13.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
11
16.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
6
9.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
10
15.3
2017 For Honor
8
11.9
2017 Project CARS 2
11
17.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
18
26.4
2016 Overwatch
9
14.0
2016 Dishonored 2
9
14.2
2015 Rocket League
16
23.7
2015 Need For Speed
11
17.0
2015 Project CARS
11
17.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
12
17.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
42
61.0
2009 League of Legends
23
33.9
R7 370 with i7-4790K at 1080p and Kualitas ultra settings
R7 370 with i7-4790K at 1440p and Kualitas ultra settings
R7 370 with i7-4790K at 4K and Kualitas ultra settings

Membandingkan terhadap pesaing

setupad-728x90.html

R7 370 Spesifikasi

R7 370 Board Design

Board NumberC631, C634
Length6 inches 152 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP110 W

R7 370 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock975 MHz
GPU Clock925 MHz
Memory Clock1400 MHz 5600 MHz effective

R7 370 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R7 300)
Launch Price149 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateJun 18th, 2015

R7 370 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL1.2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model5.1
Vulkan1.1.77

R7 370 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 1.0
Die Size212 mm²
GPU NameTrinidad
GPU VariantTrinidad PRO (215-0870020)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,800 million

R7 370 Memory

Bandwidth179.2 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R7 370 Render Config

Compute Units16
ROPs32
Shading Units1024
TMUs64

R7 370 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1,997 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance124.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate31.20 GPixel/s
Texture Rate62.40 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD Radeon R7 370 – Results Analysis The affordable R7 370 is designed as a 1080p card, so that’s where I started my benchmarks. Thankfully, it proved playable in every game at this resolution.
In the end, drawing a sweeping conclusion is difficult when there’s no actual reference graphics card. The next best approach is evaluating cards from AMD’s partners. ... AMD’s Radeon R7 370 ...
AMD Radeon R7 370: Pitcairn Returns (Again and Again and Again) In March of 2012, more than three years ago, Pitcairn first saw the light of day. It was in a card called the Radeon HD 7850 back ...
The Radeon R7 370 is a mid-range graphics card by AMD, launched in June 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Trinidad graphics processor, in its Trinidad PRO variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Radeon R7 360, R7 370, & R9 380. Launching today is the bulk of the Radeon 300 series, the so-called “numbered” parts like 390, which are categorically distinct from the Fury products.

Diskusi dan Komentar

Bagikan Komentar Anda