NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
vs
NVIDIA TITAN V

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
NVIDIA TITAN V
RTX 2070 SUPER TITAN V Perbedaan
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER NVIDIA TITAN V
Harga ₨ 7,275,594.7 ₨ 43,726,469.7 36450875 (501%)
Tahun 2019 2017 2 (0%)
Maksimum tercatat suhu 74C 84C 10 (14%)
Suara kipas Max 45.6dB 50.5dB 4.9 (11%)
Direkomendasikan Power Supply 565W 600W 35 (6%)
Patokan CPU Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz ($369.89) Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU dampak pada FPS +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU dampak pada FPS % 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
Pengaturan kualitas patokan Medium Quality Settings Medium Quality Settings
Rata-rata 1080p kinerja 188.1 FPS 199.8 FPS 11.7 (6%)
Rata-rata 1440p kinerja 143.5 FPS 155.6 FPS 12.1 (8%)
Rata-rata 4K kinerja 83.1 FPS 92.1 FPS 9 (11%)
Memori 8 GB 12 GB 4 (50%)
Biaya 1080p Per Bingkai ₨ 55,113.7 ₨ 304,146.1 249032.4 (452%)
Biaya 1440p Per Bingkai ₨ 74,651.4 ₨ 398,918.4 324267 (434%)
Biaya 4K Per Bingkai ₨ 125,245.2 ₨ 651,595.8 526350.6 (420%)
popover.html 87/100 65/100 22 (25%)
Putusan kami: Upgrade dari RTX 2070 SUPER untuk TITAN V tidak dianjurkan karena kurang dari 30% peningkatan kinerja. Secara umum, upgrade yang wajar adalah antara 30% dan 50% atau lebih untuk membenarkan pembelian hardware baru. Harga/kinerja rasio jauh lebih baik untuk RTX 2070 SUPER .

Permainan kinerja di pilihan kualitas pengaturan

Mengubah pengaturan kualitas

1920x1080

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
NVIDIA TITAN V
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2019 Apex Legends
175
195.0
196
218.0
2019 Anthem
131
146.0
144
160.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
169
188.0
188
209.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
194
216.0
214
237.8
2019 Metro Exodus
114
127.0
123
137.0
2019 World War Z
173
193.0
191
213.0
2019 Gears of War 5
142
158.5
156
173.9
2019 F1 2019
166
184.6
183
204.0
2019 GreedFall
154
171.8
170
189.2
2019 Borderlands 3
123
137.4
134
149.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
191
212.5
212
236.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
104
116.3
112
125.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
135
150.7
148
164.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
198
220.0
209
232.8
2018 F1 2018
177
197.0
180
200.0
2018 Far Cry 5
153
170.0
138
154.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
114
127.0
114
127.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
147
164.0
161
179.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
149
166.0
158
175.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
171
191.0
170
189.1
2018 Fallout 76
189
210.0
178
198.3
2018 Hitman 2
158
176.0
150
166.7
2018 Just Cause 4
143
159.0
155
173.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
150
167.0
163
182.0
2018 Strange Brigade
198
221.1
221
245.9
2018 Battlefield V
173
193.0
196
218.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
137
153.0
145
161.4
2017 Shadow of War
163
182.0
162
180.8
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
139
155.0
143
159.8
2017 Wolfenstein II
228
254.0
260
289.8
2017 Destiny 2
218
243.0
231
256.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
149
166.0
146
163.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
171
191.0
170
189.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
178
198.0
196
218.0
2017 For Honor
221
246.0
244
272.0
2017 Project CARS 2
171
190.0
188
209.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
197
219.0
217
241.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
143
159.0
145
161.6
2016 Battlefield 1
195
217.0
180
200.5
2016 Overwatch
238
265.0
236
262.3
2016 Dishonored 2
138
154.0
150
167.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
160
178.0
163
181.7
2015 Rocket League
548
609.0
617
686.0
2015 Need For Speed
188
209.0
207
230.6
2015 Project CARS
182
203.0
201
223.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
291
324.0
325
362.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
391
435.0
439
488.0
2009 League of Legends
690
767.0
779
866.0

2560x1440

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
NVIDIA TITAN V
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2019 Apex Legends
120
150.0
133
166.6
2019 Anthem
93
117.0
103
128.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
118
148.0
131
164.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
122
153.0
134
168.4
2019 Metro Exodus
80
101.0
87
109.0
2019 World War Z
116
146.0
128
160.6
2019 Gears of War 5
96
120.3
105
131.5
2019 F1 2019
109
137.1
120
150.8
2019 GreedFall
103
129.7
113
142.3
2019 Borderlands 3
82
103.1
89
111.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
126
158.7
140
175.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
76
95.3
82
102.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
96
120.3
105
131.5
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
128
160.0
134
168.3
2018 F1 2018
127
159.0
141
177.1
2018 Far Cry 5
112
141.0
113
142.4
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
79
99.0
82
103.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
98
123.0
109
136.6
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
97
122.0
111
138.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
127
159.0
126
157.6
2018 Fallout 76
131
164.0
144
180.8
2018 Hitman 2
99
124.0
94
118.3
2018 Just Cause 4
97
122.0
105
132.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
98
123.0
107
134.2
2018 Strange Brigade
128
161.0
142
178.3
2018 Battlefield V
120
151.0
138
172.8
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
98
123.0
103
129.0
2017 Shadow of War
108
135.0
116
145.5
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
93
117.0
105
132.4
2017 Wolfenstein II
148
185.0
179
223.9
2017 Destiny 2
164
205.0
174
218.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
103
129.0
102
128.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
106
133.0
105
132.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
119
149.0
130
163.0
2017 For Honor
125
157.0
137
172.0
2017 Project CARS 2
112
141.0
123
154.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
154
193.0
170
213.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
106
133.0
110
138.5
2016 Battlefield 1
136
171.0
148
185.1
2016 Overwatch
151
189.0
150
188.5
2016 Dishonored 2
104
130.0
113
141.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
108
136.0
121
152.2
2015 Rocket League
226
283.0
252
316.0
2015 Need For Speed
131
164.0
144
181.0
2015 Project CARS
126
158.0
139
173.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
176
220.0
195
244.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
289
362.0
324
406.0
2009 League of Legends
352
441.0
396
496.0

3840x2160

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
NVIDIA TITAN V
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2019 Apex Legends
60
87.0
67
97.0
2019 Anthem
44
64.0
49
70.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
55
79.0
61
88.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
54
78.0
59
85.3
2019 Metro Exodus
42
60.0
45
64.6
2019 World War Z
58
83.0
63
90.9
2019 Gears of War 5
50
72.0
55
79.0
2019 F1 2019
58
82.9
64
91.6
2019 GreedFall
41
59.4
45
64.6
2019 Borderlands 3
38
54.7
41
59.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
64
92.3
71
102.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
39
56.3
42
61.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
50
72.0
55
79.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
59
85.0
63
90.2
2018 F1 2018
69
99.0
78
112.0
2018 Far Cry 5
54
78.0
61
87.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
44
63.0
45
65.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
48
69.0
53
77.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
46
67.0
54
77.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
70
100.0
69
99.1
2018 Fallout 76
62
90.0
69
99.1
2018 Hitman 2
49
71.0
47
67.9
2018 Just Cause 4
44
64.0
49
70.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
43
62.0
47
67.3
2018 Strange Brigade
61
87.6
67
97.0
2018 Battlefield V
59
85.0
70
100.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
52
75.0
55
78.6
2017 Shadow of War
54
78.0
62
88.6
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
45
65.0
52
74.6
2017 Wolfenstein II
77
111.0
93
133.9
2017 Destiny 2
74
107.0
78
111.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
51
73.0
49
71.4
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
51
73.0
50
71.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
67
96.0
74
106.0
2017 For Honor
56
80.0
61
88.0
2017 Project CARS 2
72
104.0
80
115.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
103
148.0
115
165.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
67
97.0
76
109.1
2016 Battlefield 1
67
97.0
81
116.2
2016 Overwatch
70
100.0
68
98.1
2016 Dishonored 2
63
91.0
70
100.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
49
70.0
59
84.7
2015 Rocket League
95
136.0
105
151.0
2015 Need For Speed
72
104.0
80
115.0
2015 Project CARS
72
104.0
80
115.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
74
106.0
81
116.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
216
309.0
244
349.0
2009 League of Legends
128
183.0
143
205.0
RTX 2070 SUPER vs TITAN V with i7-8700K vs i7-7700K at 1080p and medium vs medium settings
RTX 2070 SUPER vs TITAN V with i7-8700K vs i7-7700K at 1440p and medium vs medium settings
RTX 2070 SUPER vs TITAN V with i7-8700K vs i7-7700K at 4K and medium vs medium settings

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER / i7-8700K

It's worth dicatat bahwa RTX 2070 SUPER adalah kartu sangat kuasa lapar dan membutuhkan kabel listrik layak. Dalam memori, RTX 2070 SUPER 's 8192 MB RAM lebih dari cukup untuk modern permainan dan tidak akan menyebabkan kemacetan yang ada. 4K game gembira ini RTX 2070 SUPER , dan dengan sedikit tweaker untuk setelan AA, itu akan sulit untuk membayangkan judul tidak mampu 60 fps rata-rata.

adsense-leader.html

NVIDIA TITAN V / i7-7700K

Dalam hal biaya, harga jelas adalah masalah yang asli di sini dan harga TITAN V hanya konyol. Bagi mereka di 1080p atau bahkan 1440p monitor, TITAN V sangat mahal dan ada pilihan nilai yang lebih baik dalam jangka pendek. It's worth dicatat bahwa TITAN V adalah kartu sangat kuasa lapar dan membutuhkan kabel listrik layak. Dalam memori, TITAN V 's 12288 MB RAM lebih dari cukup untuk modern permainan dan tidak akan menyebabkan kemacetan yang ada. 4K game gembira ini TITAN V , dan dengan sedikit tweaker untuk setelan AA, itu akan sulit untuk membayangkan judul tidak mampu 60 fps rata-rata.

setupad-728x90.html

RTX 2070 SUPER vs TITAN V Specifications Comparison

Board Design

RTX 2070 SUPER TITAN V
Length9 inches 267 mm10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x DVI1x HDMI2x DisplayPort1x USB Type-C1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slotDual-slot
TDP215 W250 W

Clock Speeds

RTX 2070 SUPER TITAN V
Boost Clock1770 MHz1455 MHz
GPU Clock1605 MHz1200 MHz
Memory Clock1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective850 MHz 1700 MHz effective

Graphics Card

RTX 2070 SUPER TITAN V
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 20GeForce 1000
Launch Price499 USD2,999 USD
ProductionReleasedActive
Release DateJul 9th, 2019Dec 7th, 2017

Graphics Features

RTX 2070 SUPER TITAN V
CUDA7.57
DirectX12.0 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL1.22
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.46.1
Vulkan1.1.1091.1.82

Graphics Processor

RTX 2070 SUPER TITAN V
ArchitectureTuringVolta
Die Size545 mm²815 mm²
GPU NameTU104GV100
GPU VariantTU104-410-A1GV100-400-A1
Process Size12 nm12 nm
Transistors13,600 million21,100 million

Memory

RTX 2070 SUPER TITAN V
Bandwidth448.0 GB/s652.8 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit3072 bit
Memory Size8192 MB12288 MB
Memory TypeGDDR6HBM2

Render Config

RTX 2070 SUPER TITAN V
ROPs6496
SM Count4080
Shading Units25605120
TMUs160320
Tensor Cores320640

Theoretical Performance

RTX 2070 SUPER TITAN V
FP16 (half) performance84,120 GFLOPS (2:1)29,798 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance9,062 GFLOPS14,899 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance283.2 GFLOPS (1:32)7,450 GFLOPS (1:2)
Pixel Rate113.3 GPixel/s 139.7 GPixel/s
Texture Rate283.2 GTexel/s 465.6 GTexel/s

Diskusi dan Komentar

Bagikan Komentar Anda