R9 380 Mit i7-4790K Benchmarks bei Ultra-Qualität Qualitätseinstellungen

Mit aktuellem 2048 MB RAM kann der R9 380 in moderneren Spielen gravierende Gedächtnisengpässe aufweisen. Mit aktuellem 2048 MB RAM kann der R9 380 in moderneren Spielen nur sehr wenige speicherbedingte Engpässe aufweisen.

 R9 380 Mit i7-4790K Benchmarks bei Ultra-Qualität Qualitätseinstellungen
AMD Radeon R9 380
Preis € 263.1
Jahr 2015
Maximale Rekordtemperatur 70C
Max Fan Lärm 51.6dB
Empfohlene Stromversorgung 540W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
CPU-Effekt auf FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU-Effekt auf FPS% 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Durchschnittliche 1080p-Leistung 41.0 FPS
Durchschnittliche 1440p Performance 29.6 FPS
Durchschnittliche 4K-Performance 16.8 FPS
Speicher 2 GB
1080p Kosten pro Frame € 4.3
1440p Kosten pro Frame € 5.9
4K Kosten pro Frame € 10.4
Serie R9 380
popover.html 59/100 Annehmbar

Die R9 390 könnte das sein extreme Flaggschiff der neuesten GCN 3.0 Satz von Grafikkarten, aber die Preise halten sie außerhalb der Reichweite der meisten high-end PC - Spieler. Auf der anderen Seite ist R9 380 bei einem Preis von € 175.1 beinahe erschwinglich. Die gute Nachricht ist, dass mit der Veröffentlichung der R9 380X der R9 380 R9 380X mehr Rabatt erhält.

adsense-in-article-overview.html

AMD xx80 -Karten von xx80 wurden immer durch high-end extreme mit einer Leistung definiert, die bei extreme an die Tür klopft - besonders beim Übertakten. Nachdem wir uns die Zeit genommen haben, die GCN 3.0 -Grafikkarte im R9 380 vollständig zu testen, können wir ohne Zweifel sagen, dass sie den Trend fortsetzt. Der R9 380 ist viel billiger als der R9 280 da er € 175.1 kostet. Vergleichen Sie dies mit dem R9 280, AMD Radeon R9 280X, der ursprünglich zu einem Preis von € 245.5, € 263.1. Inzwischen hat die NVIDIA ist am ehesten vergleichbare Karte der GTX 970 die Kosten € 289.5.

Spielperformance bei Ultra-Qualität Einstellungen

Qualitätseinstellungen ändern

Auflösung 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
32
36.0
2019 Anthem
20
23.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
30
34.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
42
46.9
2019 Metro Exodus
18
20.9
2019 World War Z
40
45.0
2019 Gears of War 5
27
30.4
2019 F1 2019
34
38.1
2019 GreedFall
30
34.3
2019 Borderlands 3
21
24.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
41
46.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
16
17.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
25
28.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
34
38.0
2018 Fallout 76
38
43.0
2018 Hitman 2
30
34.0
2018 Just Cause 4
27
30.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
29
32.5
2018 Strange Brigade
44
49.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
28
32.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
34
37.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
37
41.8
2017 For Honor
50
55.7
2017 Project CARS 2
35
39.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
43
47.8
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
28
31.9
2016 Hitman
46
51.3
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
41
46.2
2016 The Division
34
38.6
2016 Overwatch
52
58.8
2016 Dishonored 2
25
28.8
2015 DiRT Rally
59
66.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
33
37.4
2015 The Witcher 3
32
35.7
2015 Total War: Attila
24
27.0
2015 Rocket League
146
162.4
2015 Need For Speed
40
45.0
2015 Project CARS
38
43.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
71
78.9
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
38
42.8
2014 GRID Autosport
63
70.1
2014 Shadow of Mordor
40
44.8
2014 The Talos Principle
56
62.4
2013 Crysis 3
36
40.3
2013 Battlefield 4
43
48.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
100
111.4
2009 League of Legends
187
208.8

Auflösung 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
21
26.8
2019 Anthem
14
18.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21
26.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
25
31.6
2019 Metro Exodus
12
16.2
2019 World War Z
26
32.9
2019 Gears of War 5
17
22.0
2019 F1 2019
21
27.0
2019 GreedFall
19
24.8
2019 Borderlands 3
13
16.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
26
33.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
11
14.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
17
22.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
25
32.0
2018 Hitman 2
17
22.0
2018 Just Cause 4
17
22.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
18
22.7
2018 Strange Brigade
27
34.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
19
24.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
19
24.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
24
30.2
2017 For Honor
26
32.5
2017 Project CARS 2
22
27.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
34
43.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
23
29.4
2016 Hitman
30
38.6
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
25
31.5
2016 The Division
22
28.5
2016 Overwatch
32
40.6
2016 Dishonored 2
19
24.6
2015 DiRT Rally
37
46.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
26.7
2015 The Witcher 3
21
26.8
2015 Total War: Attila
15
19.6
2015 Rocket League
55
69.6
2015 Need For Speed
27
34.8
2015 Project CARS
26
32.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
40
51.0
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
22
28.0
2014 GRID Autosport
41
51.7
2014 Shadow of Mordor
22
28.5
2014 The Talos Principle
36
45.6
2013 Crysis 3
20
25.5
2013 Battlefield 4
25
32.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
74
92.8
2009 League of Legends
92
116.0

Auflösung 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Jahr Spiel Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
11
16.0
2019 Anthem
7
10.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
9
14.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
10
15.5
2019 Metro Exodus
7
10.2
2019 World War Z
13
18.9
2019 Gears of War 5
9
13.9
2019 F1 2019
12
17.2
2019 GreedFall
7
10.2
2019 Borderlands 3
6
8.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
14
20.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
6
9.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
9
13.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
14
21.0
2018 Hitman 2
9
13.0
2018 Just Cause 4
8
11.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
7
10.9
2018 Strange Brigade
13
18.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
9
14.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
9
13.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
14
20.9
2017 For Honor
11
16.2
2017 Project CARS 2
16
23.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
25
36.2
2016 Overwatch
14
21.0
2016 Dishonored 2
13
19.5
2015 Rocket League
22
32.5
2015 Need For Speed
16
23.2
2015 Project CARS
16
23.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
16
23.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
58
83.5
2009 League of Legends
32
46.4
R9 380 with i7-4790K at 1080p and Ultra-Qualität settings
R9 380 with i7-4790K at 1440p and Ultra-Qualität settings
R9 380 with i7-4790K at 4K and Ultra-Qualität settings

Vergleich gegen Konkurrenten

setupad-728x90.html

R9 380 Spezifikationen

R9 380 Board Design

Board NumberC766
Length8.7 inches 221 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP190 W

R9 380 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock970 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 380 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price199 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateJun 18th, 2015

R9 380 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 380 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size366 mm²
GPU NameAntigua
GPU VariantAntigua PRO (215-0877000)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors5,000 million

R9 380 Memory

Bandwidth176.0 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 380 Render Config

Compute Units28
ROPs32
Shading Units1792
TMUs112

R9 380 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance3,476 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance3,476 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance217.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate31.04 GPixel/s
Texture Rate108.6 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Conclusion. In the end, drawing a sweeping conclusion is difficult when there’s no actual reference graphics card. The next best approach is evaluating cards from AMD’s partners.
What is the AMD Radeon R9 380. The most affordable card we’ve seen from AMD’s new graphics range is the Radeon R9 380, which comes in at just £155 in its 2GB configuration and £170 for the ...
The new Radeon R9 380X is a card I’ve been expecting for some time: there’s been a huge gap in AMD’s range since it released the R9 380 and the R9 390, which cost around £150 and £250 ...
The Cards AMD Radeon R9 380 – XFX Triple X Overclocked Edition. Before we jump into all the comparisons let’s take a quick look at the video cards in question here.
AMD Radeon R9 380: Tonga Makes the Switch from R9 285 to R9 380 Antigua Pro (previously called Tonga ) makes a reappearance as well in the Radeon R9 380. This card is another rebrand, plain and ...
AMD Radeon R9 380: Tonga Makes the Switch from R9 285 to R9 380. Antigua Pro (previously called Tonga) makes a reappearance as well in the Radeon R9 380. This card is another rebrand, plain and ...
In AMD’s overall product stack the R9 380X is essentially a slightly faster version of the existing R9 380, designed to offer a bit more performance for a bit higher price.
Radeon R7 360, R7 370, & R9 380. Launching today is the bulk of the Radeon 300 series, the so-called “numbered” parts like 390, which are categorically distinct from the Fury products.
The Card. There’s not a world of difference between the R9 285 and the R9 380, both feature 1792 Stream Processors, GCN 1.2 features, and a 256bit bus.
With the launch of the new Radeon R9 380X, AMD’s stepping up to fill a massive hole in the graphics card universe, between the “it’s solid for most games at 1080p” Radeon R9 380 / GeForce ...
AMD Radeon R9 380 review feat. VisionTek: The best 0 graphics card you can buy A little bit of extra oomph in the clock speeds help make it the most enticing option for mainstream gamers today.

Diskussion und Kommentare

Teilen Sie Ihre Kommentare