R9 380X 在 超级品质 质量设置下使用 i7-4790K 基准

在大多数情况下, R9 380X 仍然能够玩现代游戏,但你必须减少设置以维持那些更高的帧速率。如果将图形质量设置保持在接近超高或极高的位置非常重要,则可以选择一些升级选项。 使用当前 4096 MB RAM, R9 380X 在更现代的游戏中可能只有很少的与内存相关的瓶颈。

 R9 380X 在 超级品质 质量设置下使用 i7-4790K 基准
AMD Radeon R9 380X
价钱 ¥ 1,587.0
2015
最高记录温度 71C
最大风扇噪音 41.4dB
推荐电源 540W
基准CPU Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
CPU对FPS的影响 + 0.0 FPS
CPU对FPS的影响% 0.0%
基准质量设置 Ultra Quality Settings
平均1080p性能 46.0 FPS
平均1440p表现 33.2 FPS
平均4K性能 19.8 FPS
记忆 4 GB
每帧1080p成本 ¥ 34.5
1440p每帧成本 ¥ 47.8
每帧4K成本 ¥ 80.2
系列 R9 380X
popover.html 69/100

R9 390 可能是最新 GCN 3.0 图形卡的 extreme 旗舰产品,但它们的价格使它们 extreme 超出了大多数 high-end PC游戏玩家的 high-end 。另一方面, R9 380X 更接近价格 ¥ 1587 合理 ¥ 1587 。 AMD 的 xx80 卡片总是由 high-end 价格定义,其性能会敲响 extreme 显卡的大门 - 特别是在超频时。在花时间全面测试 R9 380X 内的 GCN 3.0 显卡之后,我们可以毫无疑问地说它继续这种趋势。

adsense-in-article-overview.html

R9 380X 比 R9 280 便宜得多,因为它的价格是 ¥ 1587 。将其与 R9 280, AMD Radeon R9 280X 进行比较,后者最初的价格为 ¥ 1933.5, ¥ 2072.1 。同时, NVIDIA 最接近的等效卡是 GTX 970 ,其费用为 ¥ 2280 。 与 R9 280 的 3 GB视频内存相比, R9 380X 具有 4 GB RAM。

超级品质 设置下的游戏性能

更改质量设置

解析度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
40
45.0
2019 Anthem
26
29.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
38
42.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
48
53.4
2019 Metro Exodus
21
23.8
2019 World War Z
49
55.0
2019 Gears of War 5
31
34.6
2019 F1 2019
39
43.5
2019 GreedFall
35
39.1
2019 Borderlands 3
24
27.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
47
52.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
18
20.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
28
32.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
36
40.0
2018 Fallout 76
41
46.0
2018 Hitman 2
32
36.0
2018 Just Cause 4
30
34.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
33
37.0
2018 Strange Brigade
50
55.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
28
32.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
35
39.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
42
47.6
2017 For Honor
57
63.5
2017 Project CARS 2
40
45.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
49
54.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
29
33.1
2016 Hitman
50
56.0
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
43
47.8
2016 The Division
36
41.0
2016 Overwatch
55
61.6
2016 Dishonored 2
29
32.8
2015 DiRT Rally
61
68.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
34
38.1
2015 The Witcher 3
34
38.4
2015 Total War: Attila
30
34.2
2015 Rocket League
166
185.2
2015 Need For Speed
46
51.3
2015 Project CARS
44
49.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
80
89.9
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
44
49.3
2014 GRID Autosport
66
73.5
2014 Shadow of Mordor
59
66.1
2014 The Talos Principle
59
66.0
2013 Crysis 3
39
43.8
2013 Battlefield 4
46
51.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
114
127.0
2009 League of Legends
214
238.1

解析度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
26
33.5
2019 Anthem
18
23.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
26
33.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
28
36.0
2019 Metro Exodus
14
18.5
2019 World War Z
32
40.1
2019 Gears of War 5
20
25.1
2019 F1 2019
24
30.8
2019 GreedFall
22
28.3
2019 Borderlands 3
15
19.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
30
38.1
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
13
16.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
20
25.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
26
33.0
2018 Hitman 2
18
23.0
2018 Just Cause 4
20
25.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
20
25.9
2018 Strange Brigade
31
38.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
20
25.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
20
25.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
27
34.4
2017 For Honor
29
37.0
2017 Project CARS 2
25
31.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
39
49.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
24
30.1
2016 Hitman
33
41.6
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
25
32.0
2016 The Division
24
30.6
2016 Overwatch
34
42.7
2016 Dishonored 2
22
28.0
2015 DiRT Rally
38
47.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
26.5
2015 The Witcher 3
23
28.9
2015 Total War: Attila
18
23.0
2015 Rocket League
63
79.3
2015 Need For Speed
31
39.7
2015 Project CARS
30
37.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
46
58.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
26
33.3
2014 GRID Autosport
44
55.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
35
44.0
2014 The Talos Principle
38
48.6
2013 Crysis 3
21
27.2
2013 Battlefield 4
27
33.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
84
105.8
2009 League of Legends
105
132.3

解析度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
14
20.0
2019 Anthem
8
12.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
12
17.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
12
17.7
2019 Metro Exodus
8
11.6
2019 World War Z
16
23.1
2019 Gears of War 5
11
15.9
2019 F1 2019
13
19.6
2019 GreedFall
8
11.6
2019 Borderlands 3
7
10.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
15
22.7
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
7
10.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
11
15.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
15
22.0
2018 Hitman 2
9
14.0
2018 Just Cause 4
9
13.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
8
12.4
2018 Strange Brigade
14
21.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
9
14.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
9
14.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
16
23.8
2017 For Honor
12
18.5
2017 Project CARS 2
18
26.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
28
41.3
2016 The Division
28
41.0
2016 Overwatch
15
21.7
2016 Dishonored 2
15
22.2
2015 Rocket League
25
37.0
2015 Need For Speed
18
26.4
2015 Project CARS
18
26.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
18
27.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
66
95.2
2009 League of Legends
37
52.9
R9 380X with i7-4790K at 1080p and 超级品质 settings
R9 380X with i7-4790K at 1440p and 超级品质 settings
R9 380X with i7-4790K at 4K and 超级品质 settings

与竞争对手比较

setupad-728x90.html

R9 380X 规格

R9 380X Board Design

Board NumberC766, C784
Length8.7 inches 221 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP190 W

R9 380X Clock Speeds

GPU Clock970 MHz
Memory Clock1425 MHz 5700 MHz effective

R9 380X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price229 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateNov 19th, 2015

R9 380X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 380X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size366 mm²
GPU NameAntigua
GPU VariantAntigua XT (215-0877016)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors5,000 million

R9 380X Memory

Bandwidth182.4 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 380X Render Config

Compute Units32
ROPs32
Shading Units2048
TMUs128

R9 380X Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance3,973 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance3,973 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance248.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate31.04 GPixel/s
Texture Rate124.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD’s Radeon R9 380X is an ideal replacement for the company's Radeon R9 380. Its performance places it right between Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 960 and 970. The only problem is that it's a bit late.
AMD Radeon R9 380X - the Digital Foundry verdict. There are two ways to look at the R9 380X. On the one hand, it offers a useful performance bump over the existing R9 380 - a card that already ...
Asus Radeon R9 380X Strix 4GB Overclocking Results Asus's GPU Tweak software is clunky compared to MSI Afterburner, but it does give you proper control of the card's voltage.
AMD's new mid-range GPU is designed for smooth gaming above 1080p - does it succeed?
The new Radeon R9 380X is a card I’ve been expecting for some time: there’s been a huge gap in AMD’s range since it released the R9 380 and the R9 390, which cost around £150 and £250 ...
Page 9: Conclusion; ... Still, AMD’s new Radeon R9 380X does seem to hit a gap in Nvidia’s line-up, right between the price and performance of GeForce GTX 960 and 970. This could make the 380X ...
Last week AMD launched the Radeon R9 380X, the company’s latest mid-range video card. Based on a fully enabled GCN 1.2 Tonga GPU – a first for the desktop video card market – the R9 380X was ...
Still, AMD’s new Radeon R9 380X does seem to hit a gap in Nvidia’s line-up, right between the price and performance of GeForce GTX 960 and 970. This could make the 380X a more interesting ...
The Radeon R9 380X is a performance graphics card by AMD, launched in November 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Antigua graphics processor, in its Antigua XT variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
The Radeon R9 380X is built around the Tonga GPU, which debuted on the Radeon R9 285 in September 2014. Although the Radeon R9 285 has only 1792 stream processors arranged in 28 compute units ...
With the launch of the new Radeon R9 380X, AMD’s stepping up to fill a massive hole in the graphics card universe, between the “it’s solid for most games at 1080p” Radeon R9 380 / GeForce ...
This time the Radeon R9 380X was 2% slower than the R9 280X despite delivering a respectable 59fps. Although the R9 380X beat the R9 380 by a 9% margin, it was a whopping 29% slower than the R9 390.
With AMD opting to push the envelope there to maintain price/performance parity with the GTX 970, while the R9 380X is a fair bit slower than the R9 390, it saves a lot of power in the process.

讨论和评论

分享您的评论