AMD Radeon R9 M280X
vs
AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 M280X
AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile
R9 M280X RX 480 Mobile 区别
AMD Radeon R9 M280X AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile
价钱 ¥ 7,415.1 ¥ 8,835.8 1420.7 (19%)
2015 2016 1 (0%)
最高记录温度 66C C
最大风扇噪音 52.8dB dB
推荐电源 70W 100W 30 (43%)
基准CPU Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ($284.99) *closest mobile equivalent* Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz ($334.99) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU对FPS的影响 +0.0 FPS +0.0 FPS 0 (0%)
CPU对FPS的影响% 0.0% 0.0% 0 (0%)
基准质量设置 Ultra Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
平均1080p性能 28.0 FPS 43.8 FPS 15.8 (56%)
平均1440p表现 20.5 FPS 32.2 FPS 11.7 (57%)
平均4K性能 11.2 FPS 19.3 FPS 8.1 (72%)
记忆 4 GB 8 GB 4 (100%)
每帧1080p成本 ¥ 264.8 ¥ 201.7 63.1 (24%)
1440p每帧成本 ¥ 361.7 ¥ 274.4 87.3 (24%)
每帧4K成本 ¥ 662.1 ¥ 457.8 204.3 (31%)
popover.html 33/100 38/100 5 (15%)
我们的判决: 对于1440p游戏, RX 480 Mobile 更快 57% 。 RX 480 Mobile 的价格/性能比要好得多。

选定质量设置下的游戏性能

更改质量设置

1920x1080

AMD Radeon R9 M280X
AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
22
25.2
39
44.1
2019 Anthem
14
16.2
25
28.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21
23.8
37
41.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
29
32.4
47
53.1
2019 Metro Exodus
12
14.4
21
23.6
2019 World War Z
28
31.5
53
59.5
2019 Gears of War 5
18
21.0
30
34.4
2019 F1 2019
23
26.3
38
43.2
2019 GreedFall
21
23.7
34
38.8
2019 Borderlands 3
14
16.6
24
27.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
28
32.0
47
52.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
11
12.3
18
20.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
17
19.4
28
31.8
2018 Just Cause 4
18
20.9
30
34.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
20
22.5
33
36.7
2018 Strange Brigade
30
33.8
49
55.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
25
28.8
42
47.2
2017 For Honor
34
38.5
56
63.0
2017 Project CARS 2
24
27.2
40
44.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
29
33.0
48
54.0
2016 Dishonored 2
17
19.9
29
32.5
2015 Rocket League
100
112.2
165
183.8
2015 Need For Speed
27
31.1
45
50.9
2015 Project CARS
26
29.8
43
48.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
49
54.5
80
89.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
69
76.9
113
126.0
2009 League of Legends
129
144.3
212
236.2

2560x1440

AMD Radeon R9 M280X
AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
15
18.8
26
32.8
2019 Anthem
10
12.9
18
22.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
14
18.5
25
32.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
17
21.8
28
35.7
2019 Metro Exodus
8
11.2
14
18.3
2019 World War Z
18
23.0
34
43.4
2019 Gears of War 5
12
15.2
19
24.9
2019 F1 2019
14
18.6
24
30.6
2019 GreedFall
13
17.1
22
28.1
2019 Borderlands 3
9
11.7
15
19.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
18
23.0
30
37.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
8
10.1
13
16.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
12
15.2
19
24.9
2018 Just Cause 4
12
15.4
20
25.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
12
15.7
20
25.7
2018 Strange Brigade
18
23.5
30
38.6
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
16
20.9
27
34.1
2017 For Honor
18
22.5
29
36.7
2017 Project CARS 2
15
19.3
25
31.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
23
29.8
39
48.8
2016 Dishonored 2
13
17.0
22
27.8
2015 Rocket League
38
48.1
62
78.7
2015 Need For Speed
19
24.0
31
39.3
2015 Project CARS
18
22.8
29
37.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
28
35.3
46
57.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
51
64.1
84
105.0
2009 League of Legends
64
80.1
105
131.3

3840x2160

AMD Radeon R9 M280X
AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile
游戏 每秒帧数
2019 Apex Legends
7
11.2
13
19.6
2019 Anthem
4
7.0
8
12.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
6
9.8
11
17.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
10.7
12
17.6
2019 Metro Exodus
4
7.1
8
11.5
2019 World War Z
9
13.2
17
25.0
2019 Gears of War 5
6
9.6
11
15.8
2019 F1 2019
8
11.8
13
19.4
2019 GreedFall
4
7.0
8
11.6
2019 Borderlands 3
4
6.1
7
10.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
9
13.8
15
22.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
4
6.4
7
10.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
6
9.6
11
15.8
2018 Just Cause 4
5
8.0
9
13.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
7.6
8
12.3
2018 Strange Brigade
8
12.8
14
21.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
10
14.4
16
23.6
2017 For Honor
7
11.2
12
18.3
2017 Project CARS 2
11
16.0
18
26.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
17
25.0
28
40.9
2016 Dishonored 2
9
13.4
15
22.0
2015 Rocket League
15
22.4
25
36.7
2015 Need For Speed
11
16.0
18
26.2
2015 Project CARS
11
16.0
18
26.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
11
16.4
18
26.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
40
57.7
66
94.5
2009 League of Legends
22
32.1
36
52.5
R9 M280X vs RX 480 Mobile with i7-4770K vs i7-6700K at 1080p and ultra vs ultra settings
R9 M280X vs RX 480 Mobile with i7-4770K vs i7-6700K at 1440p and ultra vs ultra settings
R9 M280X vs RX 480 Mobile with i7-4770K vs i7-6700K at 4K and ultra vs ultra settings

AMD Radeon R9 M280X / i7-4770K

在成本方面,定价显然是一个真正的问题, R9 M280X 的价格简直荒谬。 R9 M280X 和 Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz 之间的这种组合在许多游戏中的瓶颈不到8%,并且完全匹配以避免FPS丢失。 R9 M280X 和 Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz 之间的这种组合是避免FPS丢失的完美匹配。 使用当前 4096 MB RAM, R9 M280X 在更现代的游戏中可能只有很少的与内存相关的瓶颈。

adsense-leader.html

AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile / i7-6700K

在成本方面,定价显然是一个真正的问题, RX 480 Mobile 的价格简直荒谬。 在内存方面, RX 480 Mobile 的 8192 MB RAM对现代游戏来说已经绰绰有余,不应该造成任何瓶颈。

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X vs RX 480 Mobile Specifications Comparison

Board Design

R9 M280X RX 480 Mobile
OutputsNo outputsNo outputs
TDPunknown100 W

Clock Speeds

R9 M280X RX 480 Mobile
Boost Clock1000 MHz1077 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz1000 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective2000 MHz 8000 MHz effective

Graphics Card

R9 M280X RX 480 Mobile
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)Mobility Radeon (RX M400)
ProductionActiveActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015Aug 4th, 2016

Graphics Features

R9 M280X RX 480 Mobile
DirectX12.0 (12_0)12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.02.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.36.4
Vulkan1.1.1011.1.101

Graphics Processor

R9 M280X RX 480 Mobile
ArchitectureGCN 2.0GCN 4.0
Die Size160 mm²232 mm²
FoundryTSMCTSMC
GPU NameSaturnEllesmere
GPU VariantSaturn XTEllesmere XT
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors2,080 million5,700 million

Memory

R9 M280X RX 480 Mobile
Bandwidth88.00 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit256 bit
Memory Size4 GB8 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5

Render Config

R9 M280X RX 480 Mobile
Compute Units1436
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB
ROPs1632
Shading Units8962304
TMUs56144

Theoretical Performance

R9 M280X RX 480 Mobile
FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS4.963 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)310.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s34.46 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s155.1 GTexel/s

讨论和评论

分享您的评论