R9 M280X cu Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ criterii de referință De înaltă calitate la setările de calitate

În termeni de cost, de stabilire a prețurilor în mod clar este o problemă reală R9 M280X aici și prețul este pur și simplu ridicol. Această combinație între R9 M280X și AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ are mai puțin de 15% blocaj în multe jocuri și poate provoca pierderea FPS minore. Cu RAM 4096 curent MB R9 M280X , poate avea foarte puține blocaje legate de memorie în mai multe jocuri moderne.

 R9 M280X cu Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ criterii de referință De înaltă calitate la setările de calitate
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Preț lei 4,365.6
An 2015
Temperatura maxima inregistrata 66C
Max ventilator de zgomot 52.8dB
Sursă de alimentare recomandată 70W
CPU Benchmark AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ ($459.95) *closest mobile equivalent*
Impactul CPU pe FPS -12.9 FPS
Impactul CPU pe FPS% -50.0%
Setări calitate Benchmark High Quality Settings
Performanță medie de 1080p 50.1 FPS
Performanța medie a 1440p 30.1 FPS
Performanță medie 4K 15.1 FPS
Memorie 4 GB
Costul pe 1080p pe cadru lei 289.1
Costul 1440p pe cadru lei 393.3
Cost 4K pe cadru lei 715.7
Serie R9 M280X
popover.html 39/100 Slab

Performanță joc la De înaltă calitate setări

Modificarea setărilor de calitate

Rezoluţie 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
An Joc Cadre pe secundă
2019 Apex Legends
18
45.1
2019 Anthem
16
41.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
17
44.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
19
48.0
2019 Metro Exodus
16
40.8
2019 World War Z
19
47.7
2019 Gears of War 5
17
43.5
2019 F1 2019
18
45.6
2019 GreedFall
17
44.5
2019 Borderlands 3
16
41.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
19
47.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
16
40.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
17
42.8
2018 Forza Horizon 4
17
43.2
2018 Fallout 76
17
44.6
2018 Hitman 2
17
42.6
2018 Just Cause 4
17
43.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
17
44.1
2018 Strange Brigade
19
48.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
17
43.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
17
43.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
18
46.6
2017 For Honor
20
50.5
2017 Project CARS 2
18
46.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
19
48.3
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
16
42.0
2016 Hitman
18
46.5
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
18
45.4
2016 The Division
17
44.7
2016 Overwatch
19
47.8
2016 Dishonored 2
17
43.0
2015 DiRT Rally
21
53.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
18
45.0
2015 The Witcher 3
17
43.1
2015 Rocket League
32
80.2
2015 Need For Speed
19
47.5
2015 Project CARS
18
47.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
22
56.9
2014 Thief
19
48.1
2013 Bioshock Infinite
21
53.6
2013 Company of Heroes 2
18
46.3
2013 Crysis 3
18
45.5
2013 GRID 2
23
57.9
2013 Metro: Last Light
19
48.5
2013 Total War: Rome 2
19
47.9
2013 Battlefield 4
19
49.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
26
66.0
2009 League of Legends
37
93.1
2008 Crysis: Warhead
20
50.9

Rezoluţie 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
An Joc Cadre pe secundă
2019 Apex Legends
10
26.6
2019 Anthem
9
24.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
10
26.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
11
27.8
2019 Metro Exodus
9
23.5
2019 World War Z
11
28.3
2019 Gears of War 5
10
25.1
2019 F1 2019
10
26.5
2019 GreedFall
10
25.9
2019 Borderlands 3
9
23.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
11
28.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
9
23.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
10
25.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
10
26.0
2018 Hitman 2
9
23.8
2018 Just Cause 4
10
25.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
10
25.3
2018 Strange Brigade
11
28.5
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
10
25.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
9
24.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
11
27.4
2017 For Honor
11
28.1
2017 Project CARS 2
10
26.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
12
31.0
2016 Overwatch
11
27.9
2016 Dishonored 2
10
25.8
2015 Rocket League
15
38.4
2015 Need For Speed
11
28.7
2015 Project CARS
11
28.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
13
33.2
2014 Thief
11
28.0
2013 Bioshock Infinite
12
30.7
2013 Company of Heroes 2
10
26.6
2013 Crysis 3
11
29.3
2013 GRID 2
14
35.6
2013 Metro: Last Light
12
30.2
2013 Total War: Rome 2
10
27.3
2013 Battlefield 4
11
28.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
18
44.8
2009 League of Legends
20
51.2
2008 Crysis: Warhead
11
29.5

Rezoluţie 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
An Joc Cadre pe secundă
2019 Apex Legends
5
13.5
2019 Anthem
4
11.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
5
12.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
5
13.3
2019 Metro Exodus
4
11.9
2019 World War Z
5
14.3
2019 Gears of War 5
5
12.9
2019 F1 2019
5
13.8
2019 GreedFall
4
11.8
2019 Borderlands 3
4
11.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
5
14.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
4
11.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
5
12.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
5
13.5
2018 Hitman 2
4
11.8
2018 Just Cause 4
4
12.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
4
12.1
2018 Strange Brigade
5
14.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
5
12.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
4
11.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
5
14.8
2017 For Honor
5
13.5
2017 Project CARS 2
6
15.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
7
19.1
2016 Overwatch
5
13.5
2016 Dishonored 2
5
14.4
2015 Rocket League
7
18.0
2015 Need For Speed
6
15.4
2015 Project CARS
6
15.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
6
15.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
12
32.2
2009 League of Legends
8
21.9
R9 M280X with Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ at 1080p and De înaltă calitate settings
R9 M280X with Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ at 1440p and De înaltă calitate settings
R9 M280X with Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ at 4K and De înaltă calitate settings

Comparație cu concurenții

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Specificatii

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discuții și comentarii

Distribuiți comentariile dvs.