R9 M280X med FX-8120 Eight-Core benchmarks ved Høy kvalitet kvalitetsinnstillinger

Når det gjelder pris, er prising tydelig et ekte problem her, og prisen på R9 M280X er rett og slett latterlig. Denne kombinasjonen mellom R9 M280X og AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core har mindre enn 15% flaskehals i mange spill og kan forårsake mindre FPS-tap. Denne kombinasjonen mellom R9 M280X og AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core har mindre enn 8% flaskehals i mange spill og passer perfekt for å unngå FPS-tap. Med dagens 4096 MB RAM kan R9 M280X ha svært få minnerelaterte flaskehalser i mer moderne spill.

 R9 M280X med FX-8120 Eight-Core benchmarks ved Høy kvalitet kvalitetsinnstillinger
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Pris kr 9,373.2
År 2015
Maksimal opptakstemperatur 66C
Max Fan Noise 52.8dB
Anbefalt strømforsyning 70W
Benchmark CPU AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core ($99.99) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU-innvirkning på FPS -7.8 FPS
CPU-innvirkning på FPS% -30.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings High Quality Settings
Gjennomsnittlig 1080p ytelse 55.2 FPS
Gjennomsnittlig 1440p ytelse 33.7 FPS
Gjennomsnittlig 4K ytelse 17.1 FPS
Hukommelse 4 GB
1080p kostnad per ramme kr 464.0
1440p pris per ramme kr 637.6
4K pris per ramme kr 1,157.2
Serie R9 M280X
popover.html 41/100 Akseptabel

Spillytelse ved Høy kvalitet innstillinger

Endre kvalitetsinnstillinger

Vedtak 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
35
52.0
2019 Anthem
30
45.9
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
34
51.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
38
56.9
2019 Metro Exodus
30
44.7
2019 World War Z
37
56.2
2019 Gears of War 5
33
49.2
2019 F1 2019
35
52.7
2019 GreedFall
34
51.0
2019 Borderlands 3
31
46.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
38
56.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
29
43.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
32
48.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
32
48.7
2018 Fallout 76
34
51.1
2018 Hitman 2
32
47.7
2018 Just Cause 4
33
49.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
33
50.2
2018 Strange Brigade
38
57.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
33
49.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
32
48.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
36
54.4
2017 For Honor
41
61.0
2017 Project CARS 2
35
53.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
38
57.3
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
31
46.8
2016 Hitman
36
54.2
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
35
52.4
2016 The Division
34
51.3
2016 Overwatch
38
56.4
2016 Dishonored 2
32
48.4
2015 DiRT Rally
44
65.8
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
34
51.8
2015 The Witcher 3
32
48.6
2015 Rocket League
74
110.7
2015 Need For Speed
37
56.0
2015 Project CARS
37
55.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
48
71.8
2014 Thief
38
57.0
2013 Bioshock Infinite
44
66.2
2013 Company of Heroes 2
36
54.0
2013 Crysis 3
35
52.6
2013 GRID 2
49
73.4
2013 Metro: Last Light
38
57.7
2013 Total War: Rome 2
38
56.6
2013 Battlefield 4
39
59.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
58
86.9
2009 League of Legends
89
132.3
2008 Crysis: Warhead
41
61.6

Vedtak 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
21
31.7
2019 Anthem
18
27.7
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21
31.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
22
33.7
2019 Metro Exodus
17
26.6
2019 World War Z
23
34.5
2019 Gears of War 5
19
29.3
2019 F1 2019
21
31.5
2019 GreedFall
20
30.5
2019 Borderlands 3
18
26.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
23
34.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
17
25.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
19
29.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
20
30.8
2018 Hitman 2
18
27.0
2018 Just Cause 4
19
29.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
19
29.6
2018 Strange Brigade
23
34.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
20
29.9
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
18
27.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
22
33.1
2017 For Honor
23
34.2
2017 Project CARS 2
21
32.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
26
39.1
2016 Overwatch
22
33.8
2016 Dishonored 2
20
30.5
2015 Rocket League
34
51.4
2015 Need For Speed
23
35.2
2015 Project CARS
23
34.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
28
42.8
2014 Thief
22
34.0
2013 Bioshock Infinite
26
38.6
2013 Company of Heroes 2
21
31.7
2013 Crysis 3
24
36.3
2013 GRID 2
31
46.8
2013 Metro: Last Light
25
37.7
2013 Total War: Rome 2
22
33.0
2013 Battlefield 4
22
34.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
41
62.2
2009 League of Legends
49
73.0
2008 Crysis: Warhead
24
36.5

Vedtak 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
11
16.6
2019 Anthem
9
13.7
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
10
15.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
10
16.2
2019 Metro Exodus
9
13.8
2019 World War Z
12
17.9
2019 Gears of War 5
10
15.5
2019 F1 2019
11
17.0
2019 GreedFall
9
13.7
2019 Borderlands 3
8
13.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
12
18.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
8
13.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
10
15.5
2018 Forza Horizon 4
11
16.6
2018 Hitman 2
9
13.7
2018 Just Cause 4
9
14.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
9
14.1
2018 Strange Brigade
11
17.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
10
15.1
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
9
13.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
12
18.7
2017 For Honor
11
16.6
2017 Project CARS 2
13
19.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
17
25.9
2016 Overwatch
11
16.6
2016 Dishonored 2
12
18.0
2015 Rocket League
16
24.1
2015 Need For Speed
13
19.8
2015 Project CARS
13
19.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
13
20.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
32
47.9
2009 League of Legends
20
30.6
R9 M280X with FX-8120 Eight-Core at 1080p and Høy kvalitet settings
R9 M280X with FX-8120 Eight-Core at 1440p and Høy kvalitet settings
R9 M280X with FX-8120 Eight-Core at 4K and Høy kvalitet settings

Sammenlign mot konkurrenter

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Spesifikasjoner

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Diskusjon og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer