R9 FURY med i7-4790K benchmarks ved Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsinnstillinger

Ved 1440p kan R9 FURY slå 50-60 fps på stort sett alt på ultra, bare uten antialiasing, mindre omgivende okklusjon og skrudd ned skygger. Det er verdt å merke seg at R9 FURY er et veldig kraftig sulten kort og krever en anstendig strømforsyningsenhet. Med dagens 4096 MB RAM kan R9 FURY ha svært få minnerelaterte flaskehalser i mer moderne spill.

Se nåværende prisliste

R9 FURY med i7-4790K benchmarks ved Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsinnstillinger
Del dine kommentarer 0
AMD Radeon R9 FURY
Pris kr 4,809.2
År 2015
Maksimal opptakstemperatur C
Max Fan Noise dB
Anbefalt strømforsyning 625W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
CPU-innvirkning på FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU-innvirkning på FPS% 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Ultra Quality Settings
Gjennomsnittlig 1080p ytelse 69.1 FPS
Gjennomsnittlig 1440p ytelse 51.5 FPS
Gjennomsnittlig 4K ytelse 30.4 FPS
Hukommelse 4 GB
1080p kostnad per ramme kr 69.6
1440p pris per ramme kr 93.4
4K pris per ramme kr 158.2
Serie R9 FURY
popover.html 68/100 Flink

Den gode nyheten er, med utgivelsen av R9 FURY X, får R9 FURY R9 FURY X mer rabatt. R9 FURY er mye dyrere enn R9 390 ettersom den koster en enorm kr 4809.2. Sammenlign dette med R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, som opprinnelig kom til en pris av kr 2882, kr 3758. I mellomtiden er NVIDIA nærmeste ekvivalente kort GTX 980 som koster kr 4809.2.

adsense-in-article-overview.html

Dessverre var ikke spillytelsen like imponerende. Selv om R9 FURY konsekvent leverer bildefrekvensøkning over R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, er gevinsten ikke mye som rettferdiggjør en oppgradering. Om det er en forsvarlig oppgradering avhenger av hvilket grafikkort du oppgraderer fra. Brukere med R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X vil ikke se en bemerkelsesverdig økning i bildefrekvensen etter å ha betalt mer for denne R9 FURY. Tilsvarende vil de som holder på GTX 980 's GTX 780 grafikkort ikke ha en grunn til å hoppe lag ennå.

For 1080p Full HD kunne vi spille GreedFall, Final Fantasy XV, F1 2019, Far Cry New Dawn, Apex Legends på 61 fps til 72 fps og holdt bildefrekvensene svevet rundt 67 fps. For 1440p Quad HD kunne vi spille Strange Brigade, World War Z, Battlefield V, Fallout 76 på 61 fps til 72 fps og holdt bildefrekvensene svevet rundt 67 fps.

Compare R9 FURY Variants Performance in Ultra kvalitet

Spillytelse ved Ultra kvalitet innstillinger

Endre kvalitetsinnstillinger
Ultra kvalitet Høy kvalitet Medium kvalitet Lav kvalitet

Vedtak 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
64
72.0
2019 Anthem
41
46.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
68.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
74
83.2
2019 Metro Exodus
33
37.1
2019 World War Z
81
91.0
2019 Gears of War 5
48
54.0
2019 F1 2019
60
67.7
2019 GreedFall
54
61.0
2019 Borderlands 3
38
42.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
74
82.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
28
31.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
44
49.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
76
85.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
34
38.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
58
65.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
51.0
2018 Just Cause 4
48
53.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
51
57.7
2018 Strange Brigade
78
86.9
2018 Battlefield V
74
83.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
49
55.0
2017 Destiny 2
94
105.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
66
74.2
2017 For Honor
89
98.9
2017 Project CARS 2
63
70.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
76
84.9
2016 Dishonored 2
45
51.1
2015 Rocket League
259
288.4
2015 Need For Speed
71
79.9
2015 Project CARS
68
76.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
126
140.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
178
197.8
2009 League of Legends
333
370.8

Vedtak 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
42
53.6
2019 Anthem
29
36.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
42
52.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
44
56.0
2019 Metro Exodus
23
28.8
2019 World War Z
53
66.4
2019 Gears of War 5
31
39.1
2019 F1 2019
38
48.0
2019 GreedFall
35
44.1
2019 Borderlands 3
24
30.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
47
59.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
20
26.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
31
39.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
40
50.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
24
30.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
36
46.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
28
36.0
2018 Fallout 76
57
72.0
2018 Just Cause 4
31
39.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
32
40.4
2018 Strange Brigade
48
60.6
2018 Battlefield V
53
67.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
35
44.0
2017 Destiny 2
72
90.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
42
53.6
2017 For Honor
46
57.7
2017 Project CARS 2
39
49.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
61
76.6
2016 Dishonored 2
34
43.7
2015 Rocket League
98
123.6
2015 Need For Speed
49
61.8
2015 Project CARS
46
58.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
72
90.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
131
164.8
2009 League of Legends
164
206.0

Vedtak 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spill Bilder per sekund
2019 Apex Legends
22
32.0
2019 Anthem
14
20.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
19
28.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
19
27.6
2019 Metro Exodus
12
18.1
2019 World War Z
26
38.2
2019 Gears of War 5
17
24.7
2019 F1 2019
21
30.5
2019 GreedFall
12
18.1
2019 Borderlands 3
10
15.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
24
35.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
11
16.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
17
24.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
23
34.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
14
21.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
18
27.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
12
18.0
2018 Fallout 76
28
40.0
2018 Just Cause 4
14
20.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
13
19.4
2018 Strange Brigade
23
33.0
2018 Battlefield V
18
26.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
19
28.0
2017 Destiny 2
31
45.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
25
37.1
2017 For Honor
20
28.8
2017 Project CARS 2
28
41.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
45
64.3
2016 Dishonored 2
24
34.6
2015 Rocket League
40
57.7
2015 Need For Speed
28
41.2
2015 Project CARS
28
41.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
29
42.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
103
148.3
2009 League of Legends
57
82.4
R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 1080p and Ultra kvalitet settings
R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 1440p and Ultra kvalitet settings
R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 4K and Ultra kvalitet settings

Sammenlign mot konkurrenter

AMD Radeon RX 590
AMD Radeon RX 590
2018 8GB kr 1,875
19% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 570
AMD Radeon RX 570
2017 4GB kr 1,078
12% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon RX 580
2017 8GB kr 1,323
7% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 470
AMD Radeon RX 470
2016 4GB kr 2,996
23% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 480
AMD Radeon RX 480
2016 8GB kr 3,495
10% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
2016 6GB kr 1,393
0% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016 3GB kr 1,489
6% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015 6GB kr 5,422
25% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 390
AMD Radeon R9 390
2015 8GB kr 4,073
11% slower
Compare
setupad-728x90.html
AMD Radeon R9 390X
AMD Radeon R9 390X
2015 8GB kr 4,336
4% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
2015 4GB kr 5,685
15% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
2015 4GB kr 13,394
6% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2014 6GB kr 8,751
3% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
2014 4GB kr 2,181
9% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
2014 4GB kr 3,933
7% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013 3GB kr 3,592
11% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
2013 6GB kr 5,694
2% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
2013 3GB kr 3,110
18% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7990
AMD Radeon HD 7990
2013 3GB kr 8,751
14% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 290
AMD Radeon R9 290
2013 4GB kr 2,716
14% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 280X
AMD Radeon R9 280X
2013 3GB kr 3,066
34% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 290X
AMD Radeon R9 290X
2013 4GB kr 3,495
8% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
2012 2GB kr 692
30% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
2012 2GB kr 4,249
25% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
2012 2GB kr 3,846
20% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
2012 3GB kr 2,619
8% slower
Compare

R9 FURY Spesifikasjoner

R9 FURY Board Design

Board NumberC88003
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP275 W

R9 FURY Clock Speeds

GPU Clock1000 MHz
Memory Clock500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

R9 FURY Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price549 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateJul 10th, 2015

R9 FURY Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 FURY Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size596 mm²
GPU NameFiji
GPU VariantFiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors8,900 million

R9 FURY Memory

Bandwidth512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus4096 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeHBM

R9 FURY Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

R9 FURY Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance7,168 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance7,168 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance448.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate224.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Conclusion. AMD is putting reviewers in a tough spot with Fury. On one hand, the Fiji GPU with HBM is a remarkable feat of engineering. HBM is only in its infancy, but the technology already shows ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
Conclusion: Fiji delivers, but also faces formidable competition. Unfortunately we are bringing you our Radeon R9 Fury X review a week late. AMD had limited samples ready for the release and only ...
Verdict. If AMD and Nvidia’s flagship cards are too expensive then the AMD Radeon R9 Fury is a good option for high-end gameplay. Be warned, though – its power consumption is high. ...
AMD Radeon R9 Fury: the Digital Foundry verdict If you're looking for the cheapest single-chip GPU that can run a good proportion of games well at 4K resolution, the Radeon R9 Fury is a quality ...
Last week, AMD lifted the veil in its Radeon R7 and R9 300 series of products and publicly demoed its latest flagship, the Radeon R9 Fury X, at a small venue adjacent to E3. While the Radeon R7 ...
The R9 Fury X's power consumption is a real achievement by AMD. Given what we had seen in the past by the Radeon R9 290X and R9 390X, we had just naturally assumed that the Fury X would use a lot ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X also supports the Asynchronous Shader technology AMD talked about recently. Asynchronous Shaders are a feature of new or next-gen APIs like DirectX 12, Vulkan, and AMD’s ...
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
In our review of AMD’s Radeon R9 Fury, we discovered that the Fury X’s air-cooled sibling packs a performance punch that justifies its competitive price tag. In fact, it punishes Nvidia’s ...
Radeon R9 Fury X specs. The Fiji processor in the R9 Fury X is based on AMD's third generation GCN architecture, previously found in the R9 295/380, and codenamed Tonga.
While AMD introduced its highly anticipated Radeon R9 Fury X in June, we’re taking a deeper look at its power consumption and pump noise. Since we were able to procure our own retail board, we ...
The Fury X uses an all-new chunk of silicon dubbed Fiji, as opposed to the die in the Radeon R9 290X, which was called Hawaii. Fiji is the beefiest GPU AMD has ever crafted, and it sports a ...
AMD says the Fury X is a reference design only, though the air-cooled Radeon R9 Fury scheduled for a July 14 release will have vendor-customized designs available.
Catching up to the present, this month marks an important occasion for AMD with the launch of their new flagship GPU, Fiji, and the flagship video card based on it, the Radeon R9 Fury X.
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
A bit over two weeks ago AMD launched their new flagship video card, the Radeon R9 Fury X.Based on the company’s new Fiji GPU, the R9 Fury X brought with it significant performance improvements ...
AMD does find itself in a somewhat strange position, what with arming Radeon R9 390X and 390 with 8GB and all. Still, we just don’t think the flagship’s halved capacity is much of a handicap.
Reference AMD Radeon R9 Fury specs. ... Of course, as Fiji is AMD’s latest and greatest GPU, the Nitro R9 Fury also supports AMD’s latest and greatest software features, like FreeSync, Virtual ...
Hva du bør vurdere før du kjøper et grafikkort

Hva du bør vurdere før du kjøper et grafikkort

Hvis du har planlagt å oppgradere systemet ved å kjøpe et nytt grafikkort. Deretter er det noen viktige faktorer å vurdere.
Oppløsning VS Kvalitet: Påvirkning på spillytelse

Oppløsning VS Kvalitet: Påvirkning på spillytelse

Hva påvirker spillytelsen? Klarhet eller detaljer?
Ultra VS høy kvalitet innstillinger i PC-spill

Ultra VS høy kvalitet innstillinger i PC-spill

Hver spiller har et annet begrep om den ideelle innstillingen for PC-spill. Men i de fleste tilfeller velger du en grafikkkonfigurasjon av høy kvalitet.
adsense-in-article-articles.html
Hva er CPU eller GPU flaskehalser?

Hva er CPU eller GPU flaskehalser?

Får du plutselige rammedråper? du kan ha en flaskehals.
Hva er akseptabel FPS-hastighet for meg?

Hva er akseptabel FPS-hastighet for meg?

For noen spill kan du fortsatt nyte flotte gaver ved lavere rammepriser.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
GPU Compare
CPU Hierarchy
CPU Compare
Laptop Hierarchy
Gaming Laptops
Monitor Hierarchy
Gaming Monitors
Headset Hierarchy
Gaming Headsets

Diskusjon og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer