i7-8700K vs
i7-4790K
- F1 2016 RX 590 - Benchmarks voor spelprestaties
i7-8700K
i7-4790K
Multi-Thread Performance
Single-Thread Performance
F1 2016
i7-8700K versus i7-4790K in F1 2016 met RX 590 - Vergelijking van CPU-prestaties met Ultra, High, Medium en Low Quality Settings met 1080p, 1440p, 4K-resoluties
i7-8700K
i7-4790K
Ultra kwaliteit
| Resolutie |
Frames per seconde |
| 1080p |
|
| 1080p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| 2160p |
|
Hoge kwaliteit
| Resolutie |
Frames per seconde |
| 1080p |
|
| 1080p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| 2160p |
|
Gemiddelde kwaliteit
| Resolutie |
Frames per seconde |
| 1080p |
|
| 1080p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| 2160p |
|
Lage kwaliteit
| Resolutie |
Frames per seconde |
| 1080p |
|
| 1080p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 1440p |
|
| 2160p |
|
| 2160p |
|
i7-8700K
- De i7-8700K heeft een hogere niveau 3-cache. Dit is handig wanneer u aanzienlijke multiprocessingworkloads hebt, veel computationeel intense gelijktijdige processen. Waarschijnlijker op een server, minder op een persoonlijk gebruikte computer voor interactieve desktopworkloads.
- De i7-8700K heeft meer kernen. Het voordeel van meer kernen is dat het systeem meer threads kan verwerken. Elke kern kan een afzonderlijke gegevensstroom verwerken. Deze architectuur verhoogt de prestaties van een systeem met gelijktijdige toepassingen aanzienlijk.
- De i7-8700K heeft meer threads. Grotere programma's zijn onderverdeeld in threads (kleine secties), zodat de processor ze tegelijkertijd kan uitvoeren om snellere uitvoering te krijgen.
- De i7-8700K heeft een hogere turboklokboost. Turbo Boost is een CPU-functie die de kloksnelheid van de CPU sneller zal laten werken dan de basisklok, als bepaalde omstandigheden aanwezig zijn. Hiermee wordt oudere software ingeschakeld die op minder kernen werkt om beter te presteren op nieuwere hardware. Omdat games ook software zijn, is het ook op hen van toepassing.
- De i7-8700K heeft een kleinere procesgrootte. Hoe sneller een transistor aan en uit kan schakelen, hoe sneller hij kan werken. En transistors die met minder energie in- en uitschakelen, zijn efficiënter, waardoor het operationele vermogen of "dynamisch stroomverbruik" dat een processor nodig heeft, wordt verminderd.
i7-4790K
- Voor sommige games heeft een cpu met een hogere kloksnelheid of in een technische naam IPC (Instructions per clock) betere resultaten dan andere CPU's met een hoger core-aantal en een lagere core-snelheid.
- De i7-4790K is energiezuiniger en genereert minder warmte.
Compare i7-8700K vs i7-4790K specifications
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Architecture
|
i7-8700K |
i7-4790K |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Haswell |
| Generation | Core i7
(Coffee Lake) | Core i7
(Haswell) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Part# | SR3QR | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Oct 2017 | May 2014 |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Cache
|
i7-8700K |
i7-4790K |
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Cores
|
i7-8700K |
i7-4790K |
| # of Cores | 6 | 4 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD 4600 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Features
|
i7-8700K |
i7-4790K |
| MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0 | MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0 |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Notes
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Performance
|
i7-8700K |
i7-4790K |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37.0x | 40.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| TDP | 95 W | 88 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.7 GHz | up to 4.4 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | unknown |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Physical
|
i7-8700K |
i7-4790K |
| Die Size | unknown | 177 mm² |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Transistors | unknown | 1400 million |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Compare i7-8700K vs i7-4790K in more games
Wat u moet overwegen voordat u een grafische kaart koopt
Als u van plan bent om uw systeem te upgraden door een nieuwe grafische kaart te kopen. Dan zijn er enkele belangrijke factoren om te overwegen.
Resolutie VS Kwaliteit: impact op spelprestaties
Wat beïnvloedt de spelprestaties? Duidelijkheid of details?
Ultra VS Hoge kwaliteit instellingen in pc-spellen
Elke speler heeft een ander idee over de ideale instelling voor pc-spellen. Maar in de meeste gevallen is het kiezen van een hoogwaardige grafische configuratie de juiste keuze.
Wat zijn CPU- of GPU-knelpunten?
Krijgt u plotselinge framedruppels? je hebt misschien een knelpunt.
Wat is de acceptabele FPS-snelheid voor mij?
Voor sommige games kun je nog steeds genieten van geweldige garfieken met lagere framesnelheden.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Discussie en opmerkingen
Deel uw opmerkingen
Hey folks.
I resently sold my i5 6600 with some other stuff expecting to upgrade when the 9th Gen Intel chips released. (which I thought was September 1st. Not October..) now the question is? Should I wait for October and watch the price fall of the i7 8700k or pay more and get the 9th Gen. My budget is only capable of the pricerange of the i7 8700k. Is it worth to wait and see the change in price? Or?
I'm going to run on an AsRock Taichi and should get at least 5.1-5.3 on water cooling.
We know that the i7 9700k is 8C/8T and there's literally a couple of games that can truly take advantage of more than 4 cores, let alone 6 or 8!
Plus quite a lot of games still benefit from HT, so makes the decision between 8700k/8086k and the 9700k much easier.
Assuming my 8086k is a well binned chip and I can sit at 5.1-5.3 on all cores, I truly don't see how the 9700k or even the 9900k could offer much more than a modest improvement.
It's not a different CPU architecture, it's just soldered coffee lake so for gaming any benefits over a nicely binned 8700k/8086k are not worth the extra money, and if you already have this chip, certainly not worth the upgrade if you use your PC mostly for gaming.
If you have other things you do, streaming or video production then sure, the 9700/9900 will be a good option, but if you are like me and 99% gaming, there's likely no value for the additional cost that intel will of course charge.
Cheers.
Hello community,
which CPU cooler i need for Intel i7-8700k or i7-9700?
Some guys recommend me this: http://
Is this cooler strong enough?
Hi all ,
I'm currently using a i7 4790 with a 1080ti ,16gb 1600 ram @ 1440p 144hz , no massive issues just feel i should be getting more fps from my card (60-80 fps on new tombraider ultra , 60/70 on AC origins drops below 50 sometimes on ultra)
I've been looking at i7 8700k mobo 16gb ddr4 bundles for and £700 would i get much benefit from this expensive upgrade?
I have been using the i5 4590 and now I am going for a full upgrade which includes RAM,MOB etc.The internet is blowing up about how awesome the i7 8700K is for gaming but nobody seems to talk about the i7 8700.Can someone please tell me which one to go for,the non K version or the K version.Please keep in mind that I will not be overclocking even if I get the K version and will the difference in gaming performance be significant when both CPUs are running at stock settings.
I have just upgraded to a 1080 TI and I will be needing a new CPU to go with it. Right now I am thinking about one of these two.
Cant seem to find many great benchmark comparisons between them. The I5 9600K is about 70 euroes cheaper, but is it worth it to spend the extra 70 euroes for the 8700K?
I am gaming on 1080p 144hz.
So I recently installed an i7-8700k with a Hyper Evo 212 as the cooler and I'm not sure if my temps are where they should be, also before asked yes its running at stock and not overclocked.
When I check the bios after a shut down shortly after following a game being played, it says its at 60-63 or so. But when I'm using programs such as HWinfo or CPUID HwMonitor, it says that sometimes my maximum it hits is like 78-80 or so while staying at around 60ish.
Today is relatively a hotter day then usual in California (93 degrees) So I'm not sure if that comes into play. Or if I potentially seated my Evo incorrectly? Not sure.
I have an AsRock Z370 mPro4 as my motherboard and any help would be greatly appreciated.
Hi, it's my first time building a pc so I have very little knowledge about processors.
Both the i7 8700k and i5 8600k have similar single core and quad core performance according to user benchmark, I have heard that most games don't use more than 4 cores.
So I'll be playing in a 1440p 144hz IPS g-sync monitor with GTX 1080 and mostly games like counter strike,pubg and fortnite
are these normal idle temps for the 8700k my setup is as follows
cpu- not overclocked stock with mce disabled
gpu gtx 1080
Motherboard z370 Asrock k6 gaming
case fans are 2 jetflo 120's intake front of case
rear fans 2 jetflo 120s in push pull config on my corsair h80iv2
using corsair link to view my temps cpu package temp sitting idle is at 33.0C
gtx 1080 at idle is 53C
MB temps are 31-33C
ram is at 33.5/34.5C
and the rad temp is 31.7C
as I said I have no overclock just want to make sure these are normal temps for idle for my setup or what I can do to improve temps, under load can get up to 65C 100% can start to touch 68-69 at some points have my case fans set to 80% and the rad and pump to performance mode in corsair app
Hello guys ,
I am upgrading my CPU and I wanna ask your opinion.
I've read some threads with a lot of different opinions on which cpu is better.
Mainly I use my pc for gaming , sometimes rendering videos (not to often tho) , some photoshop and that's basicly it .
Which CPU do you think I should buy and why?