R9 Nano 품질 i7-4790K 설정에서 울트라 품질 벤치 마크와

1440p에서, R9 Nano 거의 모든 것에 50-60 fps를 칠 수, 안티 앨리어싱 없이, 덜 앰비언트 오 클 루 젼과 그림자를 해제. 세심 한 생각을 필요로 하는 것 처럼 R9 Nano 하이 엔드 GPU에 너무 많은 돈을 투자 여부를 결정. 현재 4096 MB RAM R9 Nano , 더 현대 게임에서 거의 메모리 관련 병목을 가질 수 있습니다.

 R9 Nano 품질 i7-4790K 설정에서 울트라 품질 벤치 마크와
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
가격 ₩ 1,727,311.3
2015
최대 기록 온도 73C
최대 팬 소음 45.8dB
권장 전원 공급 장치 525W
벤치 마크 CPU Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
FPS에 CPU 영향 + 0.0 FPS
FPS%에 CPU 영향 0.0%
벤치 마크 품질 설정 Ultra Quality Settings
평균 1080p 성능 73.1 FPS
평균 1440p 성능 54.7 FPS
평균 4k 성능 32.7 FPS
메모리 4 GB
프레임 당 1080p 비용 ₩ 10,031.7
프레임 당 1440p 비용 ₩ 13,398.2
프레임 당 4K 비용 ₩ 22,424.5
시리즈 R9 Nano
popover.html 49/100 용인되는

R9 Nano 훨씬 더 비싼보다 R9 390 는 무려 비용으로 ₩ 733175.3. 받는 사람이 비교 R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X 의 가격으로 원래 온, ₩ 371671.3, ₩ 484641.3. 한편, NVIDIA 가장 가까운 해당 카드가있다 GTX 980 요금 ₩ 620205.3. 불행히도 게임 성능은 그리 인상적이지 않았습니다. R9 Nano 이 R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X 보다 지속적으로 프레임 속도 증가를 제공하더라도 업그레이드를 정당화하는 데 큰 도움이되지는 않습니다.

정당한 업그레이드인지 여부는 업그레이드하려는 그래픽 카드에 따라 다릅니다. R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X 사용자는이 R9 Nano 대해 더 많은 비용을 지불 한 후 프레임 속도가 크게 증가하지 않습니다. 마찬가지로 GTX 980 의 GTX 780 그래픽 카드를 들고있는 사람들은 아직 팀을 뛰어 넘을 이유가 없습니다. 1080p Full HD 경우 61 fps ~ 65 fps에서 Monster Hunter: World, Forza Horizon 4, Final Fantasy XV, GreedFall, Battlefield V 을 (를) 재생할 수 있었고 은 63 fps 주위의 프레임 속도를 유지했습니다.

1440p Quad HD 경우 63 fps ~ 70 fps에서 Call of Duty Modern Warfare, World War Z, Strange Brigade, Fallout 76 을 (를) 재생할 수 있었고 은 65 fps 주위의 프레임 속도를 유지했습니다.

설정에서 울트라 품질 게임 성능

품질 설정 변경

해상도 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2019 Apex Legends
64
72.0
2019 Anthem
41
46.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
68.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
79
87.9
2019 Metro Exodus
35
39.1
2019 World War Z
78
87.0
2019 Gears of War 5
51
57.0
2019 F1 2019
64
71.5
2019 GreedFall
57
64.4
2019 Borderlands 3
40
45.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
78
87.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
30
33.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
47
52.6
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
71
79.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
33
37.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
56
63.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
50.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
56
63.0
2018 Fallout 76
61
68.0
2018 Hitman 2
47
53.0
2018 Just Cause 4
50
56.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
54
60.9
2018 Strange Brigade
82
91.8
2018 Battlefield V
58
65.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
47
53.0
2017 Destiny 2
91
102.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
47
53.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
57
63.7
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
70
78.3
2017 For Honor
93
104.4
2017 Project CARS 2
66
73.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
80
89.6
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
49
55.2
2016 Hitman
75
83.8
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
64
71.2
2016 The Division
58
64.6
2016 Overwatch
88
98.7
2016 Dishonored 2
48
53.9
2015 DiRT Rally
102
114.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
55
62.1
2015 The Witcher 3
53
59.2
2015 Total War: Attila
50
55.9
2015 Rocket League
274
304.5
2015 Need For Speed
75
84.4
2015 Project CARS
72
80.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
133
147.9
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
101
113.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
71
79.6
2014 Far Cry 4
67
75.0
2014 GRID Autosport
72
80.1
2014 Shadow of Mordor
92
103.0
2014 The Talos Principle
102
113.9
2013 Crysis 3
63
70.2
2013 Battlefield 4
79
88.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
187
208.8
2009 League of Legends
352
391.5

해상도 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2019 Apex Legends
42
53.6
2019 Anthem
29
36.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
42
52.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
47
59.2
2019 Metro Exodus
24
30.4
2019 World War Z
50
63.5
2019 Gears of War 5
33
41.3
2019 F1 2019
40
50.6
2019 GreedFall
37
46.5
2019 Borderlands 3
25
31.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
50
62.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
21
27.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
33
41.3
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
37
47.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
23
29.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
36
45.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
28
35.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
43
54.0
2018 Fallout 76
56
70.0
2018 Hitman 2
28
35.0
2018 Just Cause 4
33
41.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
34
42.6
2018 Strange Brigade
51
63.9
2018 Battlefield V
40
51.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
33
42.0
2017 Destiny 2
70
88.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
32
40.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
33
41.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
45
56.5
2017 For Honor
48
60.9
2017 Project CARS 2
41
52.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
64
80.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
39
49.0
2016 Hitman
51
64.4
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
40
50.7
2016 The Division
38
48.5
2016 Overwatch
54
67.9
2016 Dishonored 2
36
46.1
2015 DiRT Rally
65
82.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
35
44.6
2015 The Witcher 3
36
45.9
2015 Total War: Attila
31
39.8
2015 Rocket League
104
130.5
2015 Need For Speed
52
65.2
2015 Project CARS
49
61.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
76
95.7
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
72
90.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
45
56.8
2014 Far Cry 4
55
68.8
2014 GRID Autosport
65
81.3
2014 Shadow of Mordor
60
75.0
2014 The Talos Principle
67
84.6
2013 Crysis 3
37
46.8
2013 Battlefield 4
48
60.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
139
174.0
2009 League of Legends
174
217.5

해상도 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2019 Apex Legends
22
32.0
2019 Anthem
14
20.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
19
28.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
20
29.1
2019 Metro Exodus
13
19.1
2019 World War Z
25
36.5
2019 Gears of War 5
18
26.1
2019 F1 2019
22
32.2
2019 GreedFall
13
19.1
2019 Borderlands 3
11
16.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
26
37.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
12
17.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
18
26.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
23
33.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
14
20.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
18
26.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
12
18.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
24
35.0
2018 Fallout 76
27
39.0
2018 Hitman 2
14
20.0
2018 Just Cause 4
15
21.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
14
20.4
2018 Strange Brigade
24
34.8
2018 Battlefield V
16
24.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
18
27.0
2017 Destiny 2
30
44.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
16
23.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
15
22.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
27
39.1
2017 For Honor
21
30.4
2017 Project CARS 2
30
43.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
47
67.9
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
26
38.0
2016 Hitman
26
37.2
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
19
27.6
2016 The Division
19
27.7
2016 Overwatch
24
35.0
2016 Dishonored 2
25
36.5
2015 DiRT Rally
32
46.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
15
22.1
2015 The Witcher 3
19
28.0
2015 Total War: Attila
24
35.5
2015 Rocket League
42
60.9
2015 Need For Speed
30
43.5
2015 Project CARS
30
43.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
31
44.4
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
40
57.7
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
21
30.8
2014 Far Cry 4
26
37.6
2014 GRID Autosport
37
54.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
29
42.0
2014 The Talos Principle
33
48.4
2013 Crysis 3
16
23.3
2013 Battlefield 4
31
44.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
109
156.6
2009 League of Legends
60
87.0
R9 Nano with i7-4790K at 1080p and 울트라 품질 settings
R9 Nano with i7-4790K at 1440p and 울트라 품질 settings
R9 Nano with i7-4790K at 4K and 울트라 품질 settings

경쟁사와 비교

setupad-728x90.html

R9 Nano 사양

R9 Nano Board Design

Board NumberC882
Length6 inches 152 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP175 W

R9 Nano Clock Speeds

GPU Clock1000 MHz
Memory Clock500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

R9 Nano Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price649 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 27th, 2015

R9 Nano Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 Nano Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size596 mm²
GPU NameFiji
GPU VariantFiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors8,900 million

R9 Nano Memory

Bandwidth512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus4096 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeHBM

R9 Nano Render Config

Compute Units64
ROPs64
Shading Units4096
TMUs256

R9 Nano Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance8,192 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance8,192 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance512.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate256.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano shows that you don’t always have to be the fastest to win the race. Some races are more of a marathon, and it’s more important to pace yourself well. MORE: Best Graphics ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is the fruition of AMD's gamble of integrating stacked high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and a 4,096 SP pixel-grinder into a compact multi-chip module that eliminates the need for external memory chips, freeing up large swathes of PCB area.
The new Radeon R9 Nano is the little brother to the existing AMD Radeon R9 Fury cards – in water-cooled 'X' and air-cooled standard models – and deserves that distinction in more ways than one.
AMD seems to have hit all the cues it set out to with the Radeon R9 Nano. This card is ridiculously tiny in light of other high-end GPUs, its power consumption characteristics are significantly ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a graphics card that serves its (very) niche high-end small form factor market well but its premium pricing makes it unaffordable to many small form factor system builders, and ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a hell of a little graphics card, delivering near-R9 Fury X performance in a compact mini-ITX form-factor. It's also expensive—very expensive—at 0, matching the price of ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
While AMD is pegging the Radeon R9 Nano as a luxury card, a component that isn't meant to be about value for money, rather it's all about getting the maximum performance for a small form factor PC ...
With the Radeon R9 Nano at the heart of our test rig, it consumed over 90 fewer watts than the Fury X--AMD's specified power ratings are in-line with our testing.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano Overclocking Results Extra performance with the R9 Nano comes in two distinct areas, overclocking and power management. Interestingly, AMD lets users unlock the power management ...
The R9 Nano is stunningly powerful given its Mini-ITX-friendly form factor, and a true leap ahead for AMD. Just know that this is a specialized component meant for very tight, compact PCs, and ...
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping 9. A lack of ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is AMD's solution for all small-form-factor system builders that want to create a 4K-capable gaming PC in a tiny volume. Thanks to a new approach to power management, the card stays below 200 W at all times, while still delivering excellent framerates.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano - the Digital Foundry verdict The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality.
AMD deserves some serious props for even creating the Radeon R9 Nano in the first place. This pint-sized powerhouse is the latest in a long line of AMD technical innovations that skate to where ...
We’ll have a full suite of Radeon R9 Nano benchmarks recorded in our ultra-high-end graphics test-bed, along with comparison numbers from an array of other high-end GPUs, a little later.
AMD’s itty-bitty Radeon R9 Nano isn’t due to launch until September 10, but a review unit landed on my doorstep today. Sadly, I can’t talk about its performance until then, but an AMD ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Fiji graphics processor, in its Fiji XT CA variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano finished just behind the Radeon R9 Fury here, but well ahead of the R9 390 or similarly-sized GeForce GTX 970 mini (the Asus GeForce GTX 970 Direct-CU mini to be exact).
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping 9.
Meanwhile at the other end of the spectrum is the Radeon R9 Nano, which sees AMD push the limits on miniaturization and pack Fiji into a card just 6 inches long.

토론 및 의견

귀하의 의견을 공유하십시오
S
Stan 1 year ago
649 $ NOT 1529$ lmao
1 0