TITAN V with i7-7700K benchmarks at Low Quality settings

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of TITAN V is simply ridiculous. For those on 1080p or even 1440p monitors, the TITAN V is very expensive and there are better value choices in the short term. It is worth noting that the TITAN V is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the TITAN V 's 12288 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. 4K gaming is joyous on this TITAN V , and with a little tweaking to your AA settings, it'd be hard to imagine a title not capable of 60 fps on average.

 TITAN V with i7-7700K benchmarks at Low Quality settings
NVIDIA TITAN V
Price $ 2,999.0
Year 2017
Maximum Recorded Temperature 84C
Max Fan Noise 50.5dB
Recommended Power Supply 600W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU Impact on FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Low Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 245.8 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 214.6 FPS
Average 4K Performance 138.1 FPS
Memory 12 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 20.9
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 27.4
4K Cost Per Frame $ 44.7
Series TITAN V
popover.html 65/100 Good

Unfortunately, gaming performance was not quite as impressive. Even if the TITAN V consistently delivers frame rate increases over the TITAN Xp, the gain is not much to justify an upgrade. For 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Red Dead Redemption 2, Assassin's Creed Odyssey, Metro Exodus, Borderlands 3, Far Cry 5 at 69 fps to 98 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 83 fps.

adsense-in-article-overview.html

For 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play Metro Exodus, Borderlands 3, Hitman 2, Anthem, Gears of War 5 at 63 fps to 86 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 74 fps. For 2160p 4K, we were able to play Resident Evil 2, Far Cry 5, Far Cry New Dawn, Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, World War Z at 60 fps to 66 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 63 fps.

Game Performance at Low Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
237
264.0
2019 Anthem
185
206.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
229
255.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
255
283.8
2019 Metro Exodus
164
183.0
2019 World War Z
233
259.0
2019 Gears of War 5
197
219.9
2019 F1 2019
225
250.0
2019 GreedFall
211
235.2
2019 Borderlands 3
176
195.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
253
282.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
154
171.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
189
210.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
250
278.8
2018 F1 2018
221
246.0
2018 Far Cry 5
180
200.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
155
173.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
202
225.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
199
221.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
211
235.1
2018 Fallout 76
219
244.3
2018 Hitman 2
191
212.7
2018 Just Cause 4
197
219.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
205
228.0
2018 Strange Brigade
262
291.9
2018 Battlefield V
238
264.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
186
207.4
2017 Shadow of War
204
226.8
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
185
205.8
2017 Wolfenstein II
302
335.8
2017 Destiny 2
272
302.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
188
209.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
211
235.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
237
264.0
2017 For Honor
286
318.0
2017 Project CARS 2
229
255.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
258
287.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
186
207.6
2016 Battlefield 1
221
246.5
2016 Overwatch
277
308.3
2016 Dishonored 2
192
213.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
204
227.7
2015 Rocket League
658
732.0
2015 Need For Speed
248
276.6
2015 Project CARS
242
269.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
367
408.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
480
534.0
2009 League of Legends
820
912.0

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
180
225.6
2019 Anthem
150
187.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
179
223.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
181
227.4
2019 Metro Exodus
134
168.0
2019 World War Z
175
219.6
2019 Gears of War 5
152
190.5
2019 F1 2019
167
209.8
2019 GreedFall
161
201.3
2019 Borderlands 3
136
170.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
187
234.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
129
161.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
152
190.5
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
181
227.3
2018 F1 2018
188
236.1
2018 Far Cry 5
161
201.4
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
129
162.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
156
195.6
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
158
197.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
173
216.6
2018 Fallout 76
191
239.8
2018 Hitman 2
141
177.3
2018 Just Cause 4
153
191.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
154
193.2
2018 Strange Brigade
189
237.3
2018 Battlefield V
185
231.8
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
150
188.0
2017 Shadow of War
163
204.5
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
153
191.4
2017 Wolfenstein II
226
282.9
2017 Destiny 2
221
277.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
149
187.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
153
191.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
177
222.0
2017 For Honor
184
231.0
2017 Project CARS 2
170
213.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
217
272.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
158
197.5
2016 Battlefield 1
195
244.1
2016 Overwatch
198
247.5
2016 Dishonored 2
160
200.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
168
211.2
2015 Rocket League
300
375.0
2015 Need For Speed
192
240.0
2015 Project CARS
186
232.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
242
303.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
372
465.0
2009 League of Legends
444
555.0

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
100
143.0
2019 Anthem
81
116.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
93
134.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
91
131.3
2019 Metro Exodus
77
110.6
2019 World War Z
95
136.9
2019 Gears of War 5
87
125.0
2019 F1 2019
96
137.6
2019 GreedFall
77
110.6
2019 Borderlands 3
73
105.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
103
148.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
74
107.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
87
125.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
95
136.2
2018 F1 2018
110
158.0
2018 Far Cry 5
93
133.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
77
111.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
86
123.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
86
123.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
101
145.1
2018 Fallout 76
101
145.1
2018 Hitman 2
79
113.9
2018 Just Cause 4
81
116.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
79
113.3
2018 Strange Brigade
100
143.0
2018 Battlefield V
102
146.0
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
89
127.2
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
87
124.6
2017 Shadow of War
94
134.6
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
84
120.6
2017 Wolfenstein II
125
179.9
2017 Destiny 2
110
157.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
82
117.4
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
82
117.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
106
152.0
2017 For Honor
93
134.0
2017 Project CARS 2
112
161.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
147
211.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
82
118.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
108
155.1
2016 Doom
134
192.3
2016 Total War: Warhammer
102
146.3
2016 Battlefield 1
113
162.2
2016 Overwatch
100
144.1
2016 Dishonored 2
102
146.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
91
130.7
2015 Rocket League
137
197.0
2015 Need For Speed
112
161.0
2015 Project CARS
112
161.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
113
162.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
276
395.0
2009 League of Legends
175
251.0
2008 Crysis: Warhead (DX10)
90
129.9
TITAN V with i7-7700K at 1080p and Low Quality settings
TITAN V with i7-7700K at 1440p and Low Quality settings
TITAN V with i7-7700K at 4K and Low Quality settings

TITAN V Specifications

TITAN V Board Design

Board NumberPG500 SKU 0
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP250 W

TITAN V Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1455 MHz
GPU Clock1200 MHz
Memory Clock850 MHz 1700 MHz effective

TITAN V Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 1000
Launch Price2,999 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateDec 7th, 2017

TITAN V Graphics Features

CUDA7
DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

TITAN V Graphics Processor

ArchitectureVolta
Die Size815 mm²
GPU NameGV100
GPU VariantGV100-400-A1
Process Size12 nm
Transistors21,100 million

TITAN V Memory

Bandwidth652.8 GB/s
Memory Bus3072 bit
Memory Size12288 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

TITAN V Render Config

ROPs96
SM Count80
Shading Units5120
TMUs320
Tensor Cores640

TITAN V Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance29,798 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance14,899 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance7,450 GFLOPS (1:2)
Pixel Rate139.7 GPixel/s
Texture Rate465.6 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments