TITAN V with i7-7700K benchmarks at High Quality settings

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of TITAN V is simply ridiculous. For those on 1080p or even 1440p monitors, the TITAN V is very expensive and there are better value choices in the short term. It is worth noting that the TITAN V is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the TITAN V 's 12288 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. 4K gaming is joyous on this TITAN V , and with a little tweaking to your AA settings, it'd be hard to imagine a title not capable of 60 fps on average.

 TITAN V with i7-7700K benchmarks at High Quality settings
NVIDIA TITAN V
Price $ 2,999.0
Year 2017
Maximum Recorded Temperature 84C
Max Fan Noise 50.5dB
Recommended Power Supply 600W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU Impact on FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings High Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 178.8 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 128.6 FPS
Average 4K Performance 76.1 FPS
Memory 12 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 20.9
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 27.4
4K Cost Per Frame $ 44.7
Series TITAN V
popover.html 65/100 Good

Unfortunately, gaming performance was not quite as impressive. Even if the TITAN V consistently delivers frame rate increases over the TITAN Xp, the gain is not much to justify an upgrade. For 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Red Dead Redemption 2, Assassin's Creed Odyssey, Metro Exodus, Borderlands 3, Far Cry 5 at 69 fps to 98 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 83 fps.

adsense-in-article-overview.html

For 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play Metro Exodus, Borderlands 3, Hitman 2, Anthem, Gears of War 5 at 63 fps to 86 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 74 fps. For 2160p 4K, we were able to play Resident Evil 2, Far Cry 5, Far Cry New Dawn, Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, World War Z at 60 fps to 66 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 63 fps.

Game Performance at High Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
177
197.0
2019 Anthem
125
139.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
169
188.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
195
216.8
2019 Metro Exodus
104
116.0
2019 World War Z
172
192.0
2019 Gears of War 5
137
152.9
2019 F1 2019
164
183.0
2019 GreedFall
151
168.2
2019 Borderlands 3
115
128.6
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
193
215.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
93
104.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
129
143.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
190
211.8
2018 F1 2018
161
179.0
2018 Far Cry 5
119
133.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
95
106.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
142
158.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
139
154.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
151
168.1
2018 Fallout 76
159
177.3
2018 Hitman 2
131
145.7
2018 Just Cause 4
136
152.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
144
161.0
2018 Strange Brigade
202
224.9
2018 Battlefield V
177
197.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
126
140.4
2017 Shadow of War
143
159.8
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
124
138.8
2017 Wolfenstein II
241
268.8
2017 Destiny 2
212
235.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
127
142.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
151
168.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
177
197.0
2017 For Honor
225
251.0
2017 Project CARS 2
169
188.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
198
220.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
126
140.6
2016 Battlefield 1
161
179.5
2016 Overwatch
217
241.3
2016 Dishonored 2
131
146.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
144
160.7
2015 Rocket League
598
665.0
2015 Need For Speed
188
209.6
2015 Project CARS
182
202.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
306
341.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
420
467.0
2009 League of Legends
760
845.0

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
111
139.6
2019 Anthem
81
101.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
110
137.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
113
141.4
2019 Metro Exodus
65
82.0
2019 World War Z
106
133.6
2019 Gears of War 5
83
104.5
2019 F1 2019
99
123.8
2019 GreedFall
92
115.3
2019 Borderlands 3
67
84.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
118
148.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
60
75.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
83
104.5
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
113
141.3
2018 F1 2018
120
150.1
2018 Far Cry 5
92
115.4
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
60
76.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
87
109.6
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
89
111.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
104
130.6
2018 Fallout 76
123
153.8
2018 Hitman 2
73
91.3
2018 Just Cause 4
84
105.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
85
107.2
2018 Strange Brigade
121
151.3
2018 Battlefield V
116
145.8
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
81
102.0
2017 Shadow of War
94
118.5
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
84
105.4
2017 Wolfenstein II
157
196.9
2017 Destiny 2
153
191.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
80
101.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
84
105.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
108
136.0
2017 For Honor
116
145.0
2017 Project CARS 2
101
127.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
149
186.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
89
111.5
2016 Battlefield 1
126
158.1
2016 Overwatch
129
161.5
2016 Dishonored 2
91
114.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
100
125.2
2015 Rocket League
231
289.0
2015 Need For Speed
123
154.0
2015 Project CARS
117
146.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
173
217.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
303
379.0
2009 League of Legends
375
469.0

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
56
81.0
2019 Anthem
37
54.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
50
72.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
48
69.3
2019 Metro Exodus
34
48.6
2019 World War Z
52
74.9
2019 Gears of War 5
44
63.0
2019 F1 2019
52
75.6
2019 GreedFall
34
48.6
2019 Borderlands 3
30
43.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
60
86.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
31
45.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
44
63.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
51
74.2
2018 F1 2018
67
96.0
2018 Far Cry 5
50
71.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
34
49.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
42
61.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
43
61.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
58
83.1
2018 Fallout 76
58
83.1
2018 Hitman 2
36
51.9
2018 Just Cause 4
37
54.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
35
51.3
2018 Strange Brigade
56
81.0
2018 Battlefield V
58
84.0
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
45
65.2
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
43
62.6
2017 Shadow of War
50
72.6
2017 Total War: Warhammer II
41
58.6
2017 Wolfenstein II
82
117.9
2017 Destiny 2
66
95.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
38
55.4
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
39
55.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
62
90.0
2017 For Honor
50
72.0
2017 Project CARS 2
69
99.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
104
149.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
39
56.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
65
93.1
2016 Doom
91
130.3
2016 Total War: Warhammer
59
84.3
2016 Battlefield 1
70
100.2
2016 Overwatch
57
82.1
2016 Dishonored 2
59
84.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
48
68.7
2015 Rocket League
94
135.0
2015 Need For Speed
69
99.0
2015 Project CARS
69
99.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
70
100.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
233
333.0
2009 League of Legends
132
189.0
2008 Crysis: Warhead (DX10)
47
67.9
TITAN V with i7-7700K at 1080p and High Quality settings
TITAN V with i7-7700K at 1440p and High Quality settings
TITAN V with i7-7700K at 4K and High Quality settings

TITAN V Specifications

TITAN V Board Design

Board NumberPG500 SKU 0
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP250 W

TITAN V Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1455 MHz
GPU Clock1200 MHz
Memory Clock850 MHz 1700 MHz effective

TITAN V Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 1000
Launch Price2,999 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateDec 7th, 2017

TITAN V Graphics Features

CUDA7
DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

TITAN V Graphics Processor

ArchitectureVolta
Die Size815 mm²
GPU NameGV100
GPU VariantGV100-400-A1
Process Size12 nm
Transistors21,100 million

TITAN V Memory

Bandwidth652.8 GB/s
Memory Bus3072 bit
Memory Size12288 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

TITAN V Render Config

ROPs96
SM Count80
Shading Units5120
TMUs320
Tensor Cores640

TITAN V Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance29,798 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance14,899 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance7,450 GFLOPS (1:2)
Pixel Rate139.7 GPixel/s
Texture Rate465.6 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments