R9 M280X with Pentium G850 benchmarks at Low Quality settings

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of R9 M280X is simply ridiculous. This combination between R9 M280X and Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz has less than 15% bottleneck in many games and can cause minor FPS loss. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 M280X can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 R9 M280X with Pentium G850 benchmarks at Low Quality settings
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Price $ 1,070.0
Year 2015
Maximum Recorded Temperature 66C
Max Fan Noise 52.8dB
Recommended Power Supply 70W
Benchmark CPU Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz ($29.99) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU Impact on FPS -13.2 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % -50.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Low Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 116.9 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 115.8 FPS
Average 4K Performance 77.0 FPS
Memory 4 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 71.8
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 99.1
4K Cost Per Frame $ 178.3
Series R9 M280X
popover.html 66/100 Good

Game Performance at Low Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
43
111.7
2019 Anthem
41
108.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
42
111.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
44
114.5
2019 Metro Exodus
41
107.6
2019 World War Z
43
114.1
2019 Gears of War 5
42
110.1
2019 F1 2019
43
112.1
2019 GreedFall
42
111.1
2019 Borderlands 3
41
108.4
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
44
114.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
41
106.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
42
109.5
2018 Forza Horizon 4
42
109.8
2018 Fallout 76
42
111.2
2018 Hitman 2
42
109.3
2018 Just Cause 4
42
110.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
42
110.7
2018 Strange Brigade
44
115.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
42
110.1
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
42
109.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
43
113.1
2017 For Honor
45
116.8
2017 Project CARS 2
43
112.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
44
114.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
41
108.7
2016 Hitman
43
113.0
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
43
111.9
2016 The Division
42
111.3
2016 Overwatch
44
114.3
2016 Dishonored 2
42
109.7
2015 DiRT Rally
46
119.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
43
111.6
2015 The Witcher 3
42
109.8
2015 Rocket League
56
145.3
2015 Need For Speed
43
114.0
2015 Project CARS
43
113.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
47
123.0
2014 Thief
44
114.6
2013 Bioshock Infinite
46
119.9
2013 Company of Heroes 2
43
112.8
2013 Crysis 3
43
112.1
2013 GRID 2
47
124.0
2013 Metro: Last Light
44
115.0
2013 Total War: Rome 2
44
114.4
2013 Battlefield 4
44
115.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
50
131.7
2009 League of Legends
60
157.6
2008 Crysis: Warhead
45
117.2

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
43
112.2
2019 Anthem
42
110.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
43
112.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
43
113.4
2019 Metro Exodus
42
109.3
2019 World War Z
43
113.9
2019 Gears of War 5
42
110.9
2019 F1 2019
43
112.2
2019 GreedFall
43
111.6
2019 Borderlands 3
42
109.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
43
113.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
41
108.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
42
110.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
43
111.7
2018 Hitman 2
42
109.6
2018 Just Cause 4
42
110.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
42
111.1
2018 Strange Brigade
43
114.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
42
111.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
42
110.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
43
113.1
2017 For Honor
43
113.7
2017 Project CARS 2
43
112.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
44
116.5
2016 Overwatch
43
113.5
2016 Dishonored 2
43
111.6
2015 Rocket League
47
123.5
2015 Need For Speed
44
114.3
2015 Project CARS
43
113.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
45
118.6
2014 Thief
43
113.6
2013 Bioshock Infinite
44
116.2
2013 Company of Heroes 2
43
112.2
2013 Crysis 3
44
114.9
2013 GRID 2
46
120.9
2013 Metro: Last Light
44
115.7
2013 Total War: Rome 2
43
113.0
2013 Battlefield 4
43
113.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
50
129.7
2009 League of Legends
52
135.9
2008 Crysis: Warhead
44
115.0

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
29
75.3
2019 Anthem
28
73.7
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
28
74.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
28
75.1
2019 Metro Exodus
28
73.7
2019 World War Z
29
76.1
2019 Gears of War 5
28
74.7
2019 F1 2019
29
75.6
2019 GreedFall
28
73.7
2019 Borderlands 3
28
73.4
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
29
76.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
28
73.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
28
74.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
29
75.3
2018 Hitman 2
28
73.7
2018 Just Cause 4
28
74.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
28
73.9
2018 Strange Brigade
29
75.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
28
74.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
28
73.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
29
76.6
2017 For Honor
29
75.3
2017 Project CARS 2
29
77.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
31
80.6
2016 Overwatch
29
75.4
2016 Dishonored 2
29
76.2
2015 Rocket League
30
79.6
2015 Need For Speed
29
77.2
2015 Project CARS
29
77.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
29
77.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
35
93.3
2009 League of Legends
32
83.4
R9 M280X with Pentium G850 at 1080p and Low Quality settings
R9 M280X with Pentium G850 at 1440p and Low Quality settings
R9 M280X with Pentium G850 at 4K and Low Quality settings

Compare Against Competitors

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Specifications

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments