R9 M280X with Core2 Duo E6320 benchmarks at Low Quality settings

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of R9 M280X is simply ridiculous. This combination between R9 M280X and Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz has less than 15% bottleneck in many games and can cause minor FPS loss. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 M280X can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 R9 M280X with Core2 Duo E6320 benchmarks at Low Quality settings
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Price $ 1,070.0
Year 2015
Maximum Recorded Temperature 66C
Max Fan Noise 52.8dB
Recommended Power Supply 70W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz ($49.99) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU Impact on FPS -12.9 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % -50.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Low Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 117.1 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 116.1 FPS
Average 4K Performance 77.1 FPS
Memory 4 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 70.9
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 96.4
4K Cost Per Frame $ 175.4
Series R9 M280X
popover.html 66/100 Good

Game Performance at Low Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
45
112.1
2019 Anthem
43
108.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
44
111.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
46
115.0
2019 Metro Exodus
43
107.8
2019 World War Z
46
114.7
2019 Gears of War 5
44
110.5
2019 F1 2019
45
112.6
2019 GreedFall
44
111.5
2019 Borderlands 3
43
108.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
46
114.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
43
107.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
44
109.8
2018 Forza Horizon 4
44
110.2
2018 Fallout 76
44
111.6
2018 Hitman 2
44
109.6
2018 Just Cause 4
44
110.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
44
111.1
2018 Strange Brigade
46
115.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
44
110.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
44
110.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
45
113.6
2017 For Honor
47
117.5
2017 Project CARS 2
45
113.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
46
115.3
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
43
109.0
2016 Hitman
45
113.5
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
45
112.4
2016 The Division
44
111.7
2016 Overwatch
46
114.8
2016 Dishonored 2
44
110.0
2015 DiRT Rally
48
120.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
45
112.0
2015 The Witcher 3
44
110.1
2015 Rocket League
59
147.2
2015 Need For Speed
46
114.5
2015 Project CARS
45
114.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
49
123.9
2014 Thief
46
115.1
2013 Bioshock Infinite
48
120.6
2013 Company of Heroes 2
45
113.3
2013 Crysis 3
45
112.5
2013 GRID 2
50
124.9
2013 Metro: Last Light
46
115.5
2013 Total War: Rome 2
46
114.9
2013 Battlefield 4
46
116.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
53
133.0
2009 League of Legends
64
160.1
2008 Crysis: Warhead
47
117.9

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
45
112.6
2019 Anthem
44
110.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
45
112.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
45
113.8
2019 Metro Exodus
44
109.5
2019 World War Z
46
114.3
2019 Gears of War 5
44
111.1
2019 F1 2019
45
112.5
2019 GreedFall
45
111.9
2019 Borderlands 3
44
109.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
46
114.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
43
109.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
44
111.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
45
112.0
2018 Hitman 2
44
109.8
2018 Just Cause 4
44
111.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
44
111.3
2018 Strange Brigade
46
114.5
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
44
111.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
44
110.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
45
113.4
2017 For Honor
45
114.1
2017 Project CARS 2
45
112.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
47
117.0
2016 Overwatch
45
113.9
2016 Dishonored 2
45
111.8
2015 Rocket League
50
124.4
2015 Need For Speed
46
114.7
2015 Project CARS
45
114.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
47
119.2
2014 Thief
45
114.0
2013 Bioshock Infinite
46
116.7
2013 Company of Heroes 2
45
112.6
2013 Crysis 3
46
115.3
2013 GRID 2
48
121.6
2013 Metro: Last Light
46
116.2
2013 Total War: Rome 2
45
113.3
2013 Battlefield 4
45
114.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
52
130.8
2009 League of Legends
55
137.2
2008 Crysis: Warhead
46
115.5

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
30
75.5
2019 Anthem
29
73.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
30
74.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
30
75.3
2019 Metro Exodus
29
73.9
2019 World War Z
30
76.3
2019 Gears of War 5
30
74.9
2019 F1 2019
30
75.8
2019 GreedFall
29
73.8
2019 Borderlands 3
29
73.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
30
76.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
29
73.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
30
74.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
30
75.5
2018 Hitman 2
29
73.8
2018 Just Cause 4
29
74.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
29
74.1
2018 Strange Brigade
30
76.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
30
74.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
29
73.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
30
76.8
2017 For Honor
30
75.5
2017 Project CARS 2
31
77.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
32
81.1
2016 Overwatch
30
75.5
2016 Dishonored 2
30
76.4
2015 Rocket League
32
80.0
2015 Need For Speed
31
77.4
2015 Project CARS
31
77.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
31
77.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
37
94.2
2009 League of Legends
33
83.9
R9 M280X with Core2 Duo E6320 at 1080p and Low Quality settings
R9 M280X with Core2 Duo E6320 at 1440p and Low Quality settings
R9 M280X with Core2 Duo E6320 at 4K and Low Quality settings

Compare Against Competitors

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Specifications

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments