R9 M280X with i5-3340 benchmarks at Medium Quality settings

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of R9 M280X is simply ridiculous. This combination between R9 M280X and Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz has less than 8% bottleneck in many games and is perfect match to avoid FPS loss. This combination between R9 M280X and Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz is a perfect match to avoid FPS loss. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 M280X can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 R9 M280X with i5-3340 benchmarks at Medium Quality settings
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Price $ 1,070.0
Year 2015
Maximum Recorded Temperature 66C
Max Fan Noise 52.8dB
Recommended Power Supply 70W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz ($262.01) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU Impact on FPS -4.5 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % -20.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Medium Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 79.5 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 63.2 FPS
Average 4K Performance 34.4 FPS
Memory 4 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 45.5
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 62.2
4K Cost Per Frame $ 113.8
Series R9 M280X
popover.html 54/100 Acceptable

Game Performance at Medium Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
63
76.8
2019 Anthem
57
69.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
62
75.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
68
82.8
2019 Metro Exodus
56
67.9
2019 World War Z
67
82.0
2019 Gears of War 5
60
73.3
2019 F1 2019
64
77.7
2019 GreedFall
62
75.6
2019 Borderlands 3
57
69.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
68
82.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
54
66.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
59
72.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
60
72.8
2018 Fallout 76
62
75.7
2018 Hitman 2
59
71.6
2018 Just Cause 4
60
73.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
61
74.6
2018 Strange Brigade
69
83.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
60
73.3
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
60
73.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
65
79.8
2017 For Honor
72
87.8
2017 Project CARS 2
64
78.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
68
83.3
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
58
70.5
2016 Hitman
65
79.5
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
63
77.3
2016 The Division
62
75.9
2016 Overwatch
67
82.3
2016 Dishonored 2
59
72.4
2015 DiRT Rally
77
93.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
63
76.6
2015 The Witcher 3
59
72.6
2015 Rocket League
122
148.7
2015 Need For Speed
67
81.7
2015 Project CARS
66
80.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
83
101.0
2014 Thief
68
82.9
2013 Bioshock Infinite
77
94.2
2013 Company of Heroes 2
65
79.2
2013 Crysis 3
64
77.6
2013 GRID 2
85
103.1
2013 Metro: Last Light
69
83.8
2013 Total War: Rome 2
68
82.5
2013 Battlefield 4
70
85.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
98
119.5
2009 League of Legends
144
175.2
2008 Crysis: Warhead
73
88.6

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
49
61.5
2019 Anthem
45
56.7
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
49
61.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
51
64.0
2019 Metro Exodus
44
55.3
2019 World War Z
52
65.0
2019 Gears of War 5
46
58.6
2019 F1 2019
49
61.4
2019 GreedFall
48
60.1
2019 Borderlands 3
44
55.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
52
65.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
43
54.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
46
58.6
2018 Forza Horizon 4
48
60.5
2018 Hitman 2
44
55.8
2018 Just Cause 4
46
58.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
47
59.0
2018 Strange Brigade
52
65.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
47
59.3
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
45
56.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
50
63.3
2017 For Honor
51
64.6
2017 Project CARS 2
49
61.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
56
70.6
2016 Overwatch
51
64.2
2016 Dishonored 2
48
60.0
2015 Rocket League
68
85.7
2015 Need For Speed
52
65.8
2015 Project CARS
51
64.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
60
75.2
2014 Thief
51
64.4
2013 Bioshock Infinite
56
70.0
2013 Company of Heroes 2
49
61.5
2013 Crysis 3
53
67.1
2013 GRID 2
64
80.0
2013 Metro: Last Light
55
68.9
2013 Total War: Rome 2
50
63.1
2013 Battlefield 4
51
64.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
79
99.0
2009 League of Legends
89
112.2
2008 Crysis: Warhead
54
67.5

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
24
34.3
2019 Anthem
21
30.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
23
33.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
23
33.8
2019 Metro Exodus
21
30.9
2019 World War Z
25
35.9
2019 Gears of War 5
23
32.9
2019 F1 2019
24
34.7
2019 GreedFall
21
30.8
2019 Borderlands 3
21
30.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
25
36.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
21
30.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
23
32.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
24
34.3
2018 Hitman 2
21
30.8
2018 Just Cause 4
22
31.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
21
31.3
2018 Strange Brigade
24
35.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
22
32.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
21
31.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
25
36.9
2017 For Honor
24
34.3
2017 Project CARS 2
26
38.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
31
45.7
2016 Overwatch
24
34.3
2016 Dishonored 2
25
36.1
2015 Rocket League
30
43.5
2015 Need For Speed
26
38.2
2015 Project CARS
26
38.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
26
38.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
50
72.7
2009 League of Legends
36
51.5
R9 M280X with i5-3340 at 1080p and Medium Quality settings
R9 M280X with i5-3340 at 1440p and Medium Quality settings
R9 M280X with i5-3340 at 4K and Medium Quality settings

Compare Against Competitors

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Specifications

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments