R9 M280X with i5-2500K benchmarks at High Quality settings

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of R9 M280X is simply ridiculous. This combination between R9 M280X and Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz has less than 8% bottleneck in many games and is perfect match to avoid FPS loss. This combination between R9 M280X and Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz is a perfect match to avoid FPS loss. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 M280X can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 R9 M280X with i5-2500K benchmarks at High Quality settings
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Price $ 1,070.0
Year 2015
Maximum Recorded Temperature 66C
Max Fan Noise 52.8dB
Recommended Power Supply 70W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz ($123.99) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU Impact on FPS -3.9 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % -10.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings High Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 59.1 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 36.6 FPS
Average 4K Performance 18.7 FPS
Memory 4 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 44.4
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 60.8
4K Cost Per Frame $ 110.3
Series R9 M280X
popover.html 43/100 Acceptable

Game Performance at High Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
47
56.4
2019 Anthem
41
48.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
46
55.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
53
62.5
2019 Metro Exodus
40
47.2
2019 World War Z
52
61.8
2019 Gears of War 5
44
52.8
2019 F1 2019
48
57.3
2019 GreedFall
46
55.1
2019 Borderlands 3
41
49.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
52
62.2
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
38
45.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
43
51.5
2018 Forza Horizon 4
44
52.2
2018 Fallout 76
46
55.2
2018 Hitman 2
43
51.1
2018 Just Cause 4
44
52.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
45
54.1
2018 Strange Brigade
54
63.7
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
44
52.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
44
52.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
50
59.5
2017 For Honor
57
67.7
2017 Project CARS 2
49
58.1
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
53
63.0
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
42
49.9
2016 Hitman
50
59.2
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
48
56.9
2016 The Division
47
55.5
2016 Overwatch
52
62.0
2016 Dishonored 2
44
51.9
2015 DiRT Rally
62
73.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
47
56.2
2015 The Witcher 3
44
52.1
2015 Rocket League
110
130.3
2015 Need For Speed
52
61.4
2015 Project CARS
51
60.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
69
81.3
2014 Thief
53
62.7
2013 Bioshock Infinite
63
74.3
2013 Company of Heroes 2
50
58.9
2013 Crysis 3
48
57.2
2013 GRID 2
70
83.4
2013 Metro: Last Light
53
63.5
2013 Total War: Rome 2
52
62.3
2013 Battlefield 4
55
65.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
85
100.3
2009 League of Legends
133
157.6
2008 Crysis: Warhead
58
68.6

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
28
35.0
2019 Anthem
24
30.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
27
34.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
30
37.5
2019 Metro Exodus
22
28.5
2019 World War Z
30
38.5
2019 Gears of War 5
25
31.9
2019 F1 2019
27
34.8
2019 GreedFall
26
33.5
2019 Borderlands 3
23
28.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
30
38.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
22
27.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
25
31.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
27
33.9
2018 Hitman 2
23
29.1
2018 Just Cause 4
25
32.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
25
32.3
2018 Strange Brigade
31
39.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
26
32.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
24
30.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
29
36.8
2017 For Honor
30
38.1
2017 Project CARS 2
28
35.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
35
44.3
2016 Overwatch
30
37.7
2016 Dishonored 2
26
33.4
2015 Rocket League
47
59.9
2015 Need For Speed
31
39.4
2015 Project CARS
30
38.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
39
49.0
2014 Thief
30
37.9
2013 Bioshock Infinite
34
43.6
2013 Company of Heroes 2
28
35.0
2013 Crysis 3
32
40.7
2013 GRID 2
43
54.0
2013 Metro: Last Light
34
42.5
2013 Total War: Rome 2
29
36.6
2013 Battlefield 4
30
37.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
58
73.5
2009 League of Legends
69
87.0
2008 Crysis: Warhead
32
41.1

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
12
18.5
2019 Anthem
10
14.9
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
12
17.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
12
18.1
2019 Metro Exodus
10
15.0
2019 World War Z
14
20.2
2019 Gears of War 5
12
17.2
2019 F1 2019
13
19.0
2019 GreedFall
10
14.9
2019 Borderlands 3
9
14.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
14
20.7
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
10
14.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
12
17.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
12
18.5
2018 Hitman 2
10
14.9
2018 Just Cause 4
11
15.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
10
15.5
2018 Strange Brigade
13
19.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
11
16.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
10
15.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
14
21.2
2017 For Honor
12
18.5
2017 Project CARS 2
15
22.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
21
30.2
2016 Overwatch
13
18.6
2016 Dishonored 2
14
20.4
2015 Rocket League
19
28.0
2015 Need For Speed
15
22.6
2015 Project CARS
15
22.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
16
22.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
40
58.0
2009 League of Legends
25
36.3
R9 M280X with i5-2500K at 1080p and High Quality settings
R9 M280X with i5-2500K at 1440p and High Quality settings
R9 M280X with i5-2500K at 4K and High Quality settings

Compare Against Competitors

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Specifications

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments