R9 M280X with i3-7350K benchmarks at Low Quality settings

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of R9 M280X is simply ridiculous. This combination between R9 M280X and Intel Core i3-7350K @ 4.20GHz has less than 8% bottleneck in many games and is perfect match to avoid FPS loss. This combination between R9 M280X and Intel Core i3-7350K @ 4.20GHz is a perfect match to avoid FPS loss. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 M280X can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 R9 M280X with i3-7350K benchmarks at Low Quality settings
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Price $ 1,070.0
Year 2015
Maximum Recorded Temperature 66C
Max Fan Noise 52.8dB
Recommended Power Supply 70W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i3-7350K @ 4.20GHz ($229.95) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU Impact on FPS -1.4 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % 0.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Low Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 128.6 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 124.4 FPS
Average 4K Performance 81.7 FPS
Memory 4 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 40.2
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 55.2
4K Cost Per Frame $ 100.0
Series R9 M280X
popover.html 66/100 Good

Game Performance at Low Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
113
125.9
2019 Anthem
105
117.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
112
124.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
119
132.7
2019 Metro Exodus
104
115.7
2019 World War Z
118
131.9
2019 Gears of War 5
109
121.9
2019 F1 2019
114
127.0
2019 GreedFall
112
124.5
2019 Borderlands 3
105
117.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
119
132.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
102
113.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
108
120.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
109
121.3
2018 Fallout 76
112
124.6
2018 Hitman 2
107
119.9
2018 Just Cause 4
109
121.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
110
123.3
2018 Strange Brigade
120
134.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
109
121.9
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
109
121.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
116
129.3
2017 For Honor
124
138.5
2017 Project CARS 2
115
127.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
119
133.3
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
106
118.6
2016 Hitman
116
129.0
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
113
126.5
2016 The Division
112
124.9
2016 Overwatch
118
132.2
2016 Dishonored 2
108
120.9
2015 DiRT Rally
130
145.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
113
125.6
2015 The Witcher 3
108
121.1
2015 Rocket League
187
208.4
2015 Need For Speed
118
131.5
2015 Project CARS
117
130.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
138
153.7
2014 Thief
119
132.9
2013 Bioshock Infinite
131
145.9
2013 Company of Heroes 2
115
128.7
2013 Crysis 3
114
126.8
2013 GRID 2
140
156.1
2013 Metro: Last Light
120
133.9
2013 Total War: Rome 2
119
132.5
2013 Battlefield 4
122
136.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
157
175.0
2009 League of Legends
215
238.9
2008 Crysis: Warhead
125
139.5

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
98
122.8
2019 Anthem
93
117.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
98
122.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
100
125.7
2019 Metro Exodus
92
115.6
2019 World War Z
101
126.8
2019 Gears of War 5
95
119.4
2019 F1 2019
98
122.6
2019 GreedFall
96
121.2
2019 Borderlands 3
92
116.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
101
126.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
91
114.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
95
119.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
97
121.6
2018 Hitman 2
93
116.3
2018 Just Cause 4
95
119.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
95
119.9
2018 Strange Brigade
101
127.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
96
120.3
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
94
117.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
99
124.8
2017 For Honor
101
126.3
2017 Project CARS 2
98
123.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
106
133.3
2016 Overwatch
100
125.9
2016 Dishonored 2
96
121.1
2015 Rocket League
120
150.6
2015 Need For Speed
102
127.8
2015 Project CARS
101
126.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
110
138.5
2014 Thief
100
126.2
2013 Bioshock Infinite
106
132.5
2013 Company of Heroes 2
98
122.8
2013 Crysis 3
103
129.3
2013 GRID 2
115
144.1
2013 Metro: Last Light
105
131.3
2013 Total War: Rome 2
99
124.6
2013 Battlefield 4
100
126.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
132
165.8
2009 League of Legends
144
181.0
2008 Crysis: Warhead
103
129.7

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
57
81.6
2019 Anthem
54
77.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
56
80.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
56
81.2
2019 Metro Exodus
54
77.7
2019 World War Z
58
83.5
2019 Gears of War 5
56
80.1
2019 F1 2019
57
82.2
2019 GreedFall
54
77.6
2019 Borderlands 3
53
76.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
58
84.1
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
53
77.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
56
80.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
57
81.6
2018 Hitman 2
54
77.6
2018 Just Cause 4
55
78.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
54
78.2
2018 Strange Brigade
58
83.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
55
79.6
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
54
77.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
59
84.7
2017 For Honor
57
81.6
2017 Project CARS 2
60
86.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
66
94.7
2016 Overwatch
57
81.7
2016 Dishonored 2
58
83.7
2015 Rocket League
64
92.3
2015 Need For Speed
60
86.2
2015 Project CARS
60
86.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
60
86.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
87
125.7
2009 League of Legends
71
101.5
R9 M280X with i3-7350K at 1080p and Low Quality settings
R9 M280X with i3-7350K at 1440p and Low Quality settings
R9 M280X with i3-7350K at 4K and Low Quality settings

Compare Against Competitors

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Specifications

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments