R9 M280X with Phenom II X4 910 benchmarks at Low Quality settings

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of R9 M280X is simply ridiculous. This combination between R9 M280X and AMD Phenom II X4 910 has less than 15% bottleneck in many games and can cause minor FPS loss. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 M280X can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 R9 M280X with Phenom II X4 910 benchmarks at Low Quality settings
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Price $ 1,070.0
Year 2015
Maximum Recorded Temperature 66C
Max Fan Noise 52.8dB
Recommended Power Supply 70W
Benchmark CPU AMD Phenom II X4 910 ($100) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU Impact on FPS -10.6 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % -40.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Low Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 119.4 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 117.7 FPS
Average 4K Performance 78.0 FPS
Memory 4 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 61.5
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 84.3
4K Cost Per Frame $ 152.9
Series R9 M280X
popover.html 66/100 Good

Game Performance at Low Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
61
115.4
2019 Anthem
58
110.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
60
114.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
63
119.2
2019 Metro Exodus
58
109.6
2019 World War Z
63
118.7
2019 Gears of War 5
60
113.1
2019 F1 2019
61
116.0
2019 GreedFall
60
114.6
2019 Borderlands 3
58
110.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
63
119.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
57
108.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
59
112.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
59
112.8
2018 Fallout 76
60
114.6
2018 Hitman 2
59
112.0
2018 Just Cause 4
60
113.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
60
113.9
2018 Strange Brigade
63
119.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
60
113.1
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
59
112.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
62
117.3
2017 For Honor
64
122.4
2017 Project CARS 2
61
116.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
63
119.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
59
111.3
2016 Hitman
62
117.1
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
61
115.7
2016 The Division
60
114.8
2016 Overwatch
63
118.9
2016 Dishonored 2
59
112.6
2015 DiRT Rally
66
126.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
61
115.2
2015 The Witcher 3
59
112.7
2015 Rocket League
85
161.6
2015 Need For Speed
62
118.5
2015 Project CARS
62
117.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
69
130.9
2014 Thief
63
119.3
2013 Bioshock Infinite
67
126.6
2013 Company of Heroes 2
62
116.9
2013 Crysis 3
61
115.9
2013 GRID 2
70
132.3
2013 Metro: Last Light
63
119.8
2013 Total War: Rome 2
63
119.0
2013 Battlefield 4
64
121.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
75
142.8
2009 League of Legends
94
178.6
2008 Crysis: Warhead
65
123.0

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
61
115.0
2019 Anthem
59
111.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
60
114.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
61
116.6
2019 Metro Exodus
58
110.9
2019 World War Z
62
117.2
2019 Gears of War 5
60
113.1
2019 F1 2019
60
114.9
2019 GreedFall
60
114.1
2019 Borderlands 3
59
111.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
62
117.2
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
58
110.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
60
113.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
60
114.3
2018 Hitman 2
59
111.3
2018 Just Cause 4
60
113.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
60
113.3
2018 Strange Brigade
62
117.5
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
60
113.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
59
112.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
61
116.1
2017 For Honor
62
116.9
2017 Project CARS 2
61
115.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
64
120.8
2016 Overwatch
61
116.7
2016 Dishonored 2
60
114.0
2015 Rocket League
69
130.5
2015 Need For Speed
62
117.7
2015 Project CARS
62
117.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
65
123.7
2014 Thief
62
116.8
2013 Bioshock Infinite
63
120.4
2013 Company of Heroes 2
61
115.0
2013 Crysis 3
62
118.6
2013 GRID 2
67
126.9
2013 Metro: Last Light
63
119.7
2013 Total War: Rome 2
61
116.0
2013 Battlefield 4
62
116.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
73
139.0
2009 League of Legends
78
147.5
2008 Crysis: Warhead
63
118.8

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
40
76.9
2019 Anthem
39
74.7
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
40
76.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
40
76.7
2019 Metro Exodus
39
74.8
2019 World War Z
41
78.0
2019 Gears of War 5
40
76.1
2019 F1 2019
41
77.3
2019 GreedFall
39
74.7
2019 Borderlands 3
39
74.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
41
78.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
39
74.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
40
76.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
40
76.9
2018 Hitman 2
39
74.7
2018 Just Cause 4
39
75.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
39
75.0
2018 Strange Brigade
41
77.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
40
75.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
39
74.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
41
78.6
2017 For Honor
40
76.9
2017 Project CARS 2
42
79.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
44
84.3
2016 Overwatch
40
77.0
2016 Dishonored 2
41
78.1
2015 Rocket League
44
82.9
2015 Need For Speed
42
79.5
2015 Project CARS
42
79.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
42
79.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
53
101.6
2009 League of Legends
46
88.0
R9 M280X with Phenom II X4 910 at 1080p and Low Quality settings
R9 M280X with Phenom II X4 910 at 1440p and Low Quality settings
R9 M280X with Phenom II X4 910 at 4K and Low Quality settings

Compare Against Competitors

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Specifications

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments