R9 M280X with Phenom 9850 Quad-Core benchmarks at Low Quality settings

In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here and the price of R9 M280X is simply ridiculous. This combination between R9 M280X and AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core has less than 15% bottleneck in many games and can cause minor FPS loss. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 M280X can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

 R9 M280X with Phenom 9850 Quad-Core benchmarks at Low Quality settings
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Price $ 1,070.0
Year 2015
Maximum Recorded Temperature 66C
Max Fan Noise 52.8dB
Recommended Power Supply 70W
Benchmark CPU AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core ($50) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU Impact on FPS -11.5 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % -40.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Low Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 118.5 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 117.1 FPS
Average 4K Performance 77.6 FPS
Memory 4 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 64.9
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 88.4
4K Cost Per Frame $ 162.1
Series R9 M280X
popover.html 66/100 Good

Game Performance at Low Quality settings

Change Quality Settings

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
55
114.2
2019 Anthem
53
109.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
54
113.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
56
117.7
2019 Metro Exodus
52
109.0
2019 World War Z
56
117.3
2019 Gears of War 5
54
112.2
2019 F1 2019
55
114.7
2019 GreedFall
54
113.5
2019 Borderlands 3
53
110.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
56
117.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
52
108.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
53
111.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
54
111.8
2018 Fallout 76
54
113.5
2018 Hitman 2
53
111.2
2018 Just Cause 4
54
112.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
54
112.9
2018 Strange Brigade
57
118.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
54
112.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
54
112.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
56
115.9
2017 For Honor
58
120.6
2017 Project CARS 2
55
115.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
57
118.0
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
53
110.5
2016 Hitman
56
115.8
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
55
114.5
2016 The Division
55
113.7
2016 Overwatch
56
117.4
2016 Dishonored 2
54
111.6
2015 DiRT Rally
60
124.1
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
55
114.1
2015 The Witcher 3
54
111.7
2015 Rocket League
75
156.3
2015 Need For Speed
56
117.1
2015 Project CARS
56
116.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
62
128.4
2014 Thief
57
117.8
2013 Bioshock Infinite
60
124.4
2013 Company of Heroes 2
55
115.6
2013 Crysis 3
55
114.6
2013 GRID 2
62
129.6
2013 Metro: Last Light
57
118.3
2013 Total War: Rome 2
56
117.5
2013 Battlefield 4
57
119.4
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
67
139.2
2009 League of Legends
83
171.9
2008 Crysis: Warhead
58
121.1

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
55
114.1
2019 Anthem
53
111.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
55
114.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
55
115.6
2019 Metro Exodus
53
110.4
2019 World War Z
56
116.1
2019 Gears of War 5
54
112.4
2019 F1 2019
55
114.0
2019 GreedFall
54
113.3
2019 Borderlands 3
53
110.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
56
116.1
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
53
109.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
54
112.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
54
113.5
2018 Hitman 2
53
110.8
2018 Just Cause 4
54
112.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
54
112.6
2018 Strange Brigade
56
116.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
54
112.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
53
111.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
55
115.1
2017 For Honor
56
115.9
2017 Project CARS 2
55
114.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
57
119.4
2016 Overwatch
56
115.7
2016 Dishonored 2
54
113.2
2015 Rocket League
62
128.3
2015 Need For Speed
56
116.6
2015 Project CARS
56
116.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
59
122.1
2014 Thief
56
115.8
2013 Bioshock Infinite
57
119.0
2013 Company of Heroes 2
55
114.1
2013 Crysis 3
56
117.4
2013 GRID 2
60
125.0
2013 Metro: Last Light
57
118.4
2013 Total War: Rome 2
55
115.0
2013 Battlefield 4
56
115.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
65
136.0
2009 League of Legends
69
143.8
2008 Crysis: Warhead
56
117.6

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
36
76.4
2019 Anthem
36
74.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
36
75.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
36
76.2
2019 Metro Exodus
36
74.4
2019 World War Z
37
77.4
2019 Gears of War 5
36
75.6
2019 F1 2019
37
76.7
2019 GreedFall
36
74.4
2019 Borderlands 3
35
74.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
37
77.7
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
35
74.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
36
75.6
2018 Forza Horizon 4
36
76.4
2018 Hitman 2
36
74.4
2018 Just Cause 4
36
74.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
36
74.7
2018 Strange Brigade
37
77.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
36
75.4
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
36
74.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
37
78.0
2017 For Honor
36
76.4
2017 Project CARS 2
38
78.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
40
83.1
2016 Overwatch
37
76.5
2016 Dishonored 2
37
77.5
2015 Rocket League
39
81.8
2015 Need For Speed
38
78.7
2015 Project CARS
38
78.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
38
78.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
47
98.9
2009 League of Legends
41
86.5
R9 M280X with Phenom 9850 Quad-Core at 1080p and Low Quality settings
R9 M280X with Phenom 9850 Quad-Core at 1440p and Low Quality settings
R9 M280X with Phenom 9850 Quad-Core at 4K and Low Quality settings

Compare Against Competitors

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Specifications

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments