R9 M280X avulla Athlon X4 760K Quad Core vertailu arvot Laadukkaita aikaa avu laskeva

Kustannusten osalta hinnoittelu on selvästikin todellinen kysymys, ja hinta R9 M280X on yksinkertaisesti naurettava. Tämä yhdistelmä välillä R9 M280X ja AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core on alle 8% pullon kaula monissa peleissä ja on täydellinen ottelu välttää FPS tappio. Tämä yhdistelmä R9 M280X ja AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core on täydellinen ottelu välttää FPS tappio. Nykyisellä 4096 MB RAM R9 M280X , voi olla hyvin vähän muistia liittyviä pullon kauloja enemmän nykyaikaisia pelejä.

 R9 M280X avulla Athlon X4 760K Quad Core vertailu arvot Laadukkaita aikaa avu laskeva
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Hinta € 941.6
Vuoden 2015
Suurin mitattu lämpö tila 66C
Max tuulettimen melu 52.8dB
Suositeltava virta lähde 70W
Benchmark CPU AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core ($46) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU vaikutus FPS -6.7 FPS
CPU vaikutus FPS% -20.0%
Benchmark laatu asetukset High Quality Settings
Keskimääräinen 1080p-suoritus kyky 56.3 FPS
Keski määrin 1440p suoritus kyky 34.6 FPS
Keskimääräinen 4K-suoritus kyky 17.5 FPS
Muisti 4 GB
1080p per kehys € 44.2
1440p kehyskulut € 60.4
4K Kustannus per kehys € 110.8
Sarja R9 M280X
popover.html 41/100 Hyväksyttävää

Pelin suoritus kyky Laadukkaita asetuksissa

Muuta laatu asetuksia

Päätöslauselman 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Vuoden Peli Kehystä sekunnissa
2019 Apex Legends
38
53.3
2019 Anthem
34
46.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
38
52.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
42
58.6
2019 Metro Exodus
33
45.5
2019 World War Z
42
57.9
2019 Gears of War 5
36
50.3
2019 F1 2019
39
54.1
2019 GreedFall
37
52.2
2019 Borderlands 3
34
47.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
42
58.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
31
43.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
35
49.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
36
49.8
2018 Fallout 76
38
52.3
2018 Hitman 2
35
48.7
2018 Just Cause 4
36
50.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
37
51.4
2018 Strange Brigade
43
59.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
36
50.3
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
36
50.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
40
55.9
2017 For Honor
45
63.0
2017 Project CARS 2
39
54.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
42
59.0
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
34
47.7
2016 Hitman
40
55.7
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
39
53.8
2016 The Division
38
52.5
2016 Overwatch
42
58.1
2016 Dishonored 2
36
49.5
2015 DiRT Rally
49
68.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
38
53.1
2015 The Witcher 3
36
49.6
2015 Rocket League
84
116.6
2015 Need For Speed
41
57.6
2015 Project CARS
41
56.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
54
74.6
2014 Thief
42
58.7
2013 Bioshock Infinite
49
68.7
2013 Company of Heroes 2
40
55.4
2013 Crysis 3
39
54.0
2013 GRID 2
55
76.5
2013 Metro: Last Light
43
59.4
2013 Total War: Rome 2
42
58.3
2013 Battlefield 4
44
61.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
66
90.9
2009 League of Legends
101
139.9
2008 Crysis: Warhead
46
63.7

Päätöslauselman 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Vuoden Peli Kehystä sekunnissa
2019 Apex Legends
23
32.7
2019 Anthem
20
28.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
23
32.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
25
34.9
2019 Metro Exodus
19
27.1
2019 World War Z
25
35.7
2019 Gears of War 5
21
30.1
2019 F1 2019
23
32.5
2019 GreedFall
22
31.4
2019 Borderlands 3
20
27.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
25
35.7
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
19
26.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
21
30.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
23
31.7
2018 Hitman 2
20
27.7
2018 Just Cause 4
21
30.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
22
30.4
2018 Strange Brigade
26
36.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
22
30.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
20
28.6
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
24
34.2
2017 For Honor
25
35.4
2017 Project CARS 2
24
33.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
29
40.7
2016 Overwatch
25
35.0
2016 Dishonored 2
22
31.4
2015 Rocket League
39
54.0
2015 Need For Speed
26
36.5
2015 Project CARS
25
35.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
32
44.7
2014 Thief
25
35.2
2013 Bioshock Infinite
29
40.1
2013 Company of Heroes 2
23
32.7
2013 Crysis 3
27
37.6
2013 GRID 2
35
49.0
2013 Metro: Last Light
28
39.1
2013 Total War: Rome 2
24
34.1
2013 Battlefield 4
25
35.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
47
65.6
2009 League of Legends
56
77.3
2008 Crysis: Warhead
27
37.9

Päätöslauselman 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Vuoden Peli Kehystä sekunnissa
2019 Apex Legends
11
17.1
2019 Anthem
9
14.1
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
11
16.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
11
16.8
2019 Metro Exodus
9
14.2
2019 World War Z
13
18.6
2019 Gears of War 5
11
16.0
2019 F1 2019
12
17.6
2019 GreedFall
9
14.1
2019 Borderlands 3
9
13.4
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
13
19.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
9
13.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
11
16.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
11
17.1
2018 Hitman 2
9
14.1
2018 Just Cause 4
10
14.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
10
14.5
2018 Strange Brigade
12
18.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
10
15.6
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
10
14.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
13
19.5
2017 For Honor
11
17.1
2017 Project CARS 2
14
20.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
19
27.2
2016 Overwatch
12
17.2
2016 Dishonored 2
13
18.7
2015 Rocket League
17
25.3
2015 Need For Speed
14
20.6
2015 Project CARS
14
20.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
14
20.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
35
51.0
2009 League of Legends
22
32.3
R9 M280X with Athlon X4 760K Quad Core at 1080p and Laadukkaita settings
R9 M280X with Athlon X4 760K Quad Core at 1440p and Laadukkaita settings
R9 M280X with Athlon X4 760K Quad Core at 4K and Laadukkaita settings

Vertaa kilpailijoitaan vastaan

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Eritelmät

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Keskustelu ja kommentit

Jaa kommenttisi