R9 M280X con i7-4960X benchmarks en Ultra calidad ajustes de calidad

En términos de costo, la fijación de precios es claramente un problema genuino aquí R9 M280X y el precio de es simplemente ridículo. Esta combinación entre R9 M280X y Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz tiene menos de un 8% de cuello de botella en muchos juegos y es perfecto para evitar la pérdida de fps. Esta combinación entre R9 M280X y Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz es un juego perfecto para evitar la pérdida de fps. Con MB 4096 RAM actual, puede R9 M280X tener muy pocos cuellos de botella relacionados con la memoria en juegos más modernos.

 R9 M280X con i7-4960X benchmarks en Ultra calidad ajustes de calidad
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Precio € 941.6
Yera 2015
Temperatura máxima registrada 66C
Ruido máximo del ventilador 52.8dB
Fuente de alimentación recomendada 70W
CPU de Benchmark Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz ($769.99) *closest mobile equivalent*
Impacto de CPU en FPS -0.6 FPS
Impacto de CPU en FPS% 0.0%
Parámetros de calidad de Benchmark Ultra Quality Settings
Rendimiento medio de 1080p 27.5 FPS
Rendimiento 1440p promedio 20.1 FPS
Rendimiento promedio de 4K 11.0 FPS
Memoria 4 GB
1080p costo por cuadro € 34.2
1440p costo por cuadro € 46.8
Costo 4K por cuadro € 85.6
Serie R9 M280X
popover.html 33/100 Débil

Rendimiento del juego Ultra calidad en la configuración

Cambiar la configuración de calidad

Resolución 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Yera Juego FotoGramas por segundo
2019 Apex Legends
22
24.7
2019 Anthem
14
15.9
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
20
23.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
28
31.7
2019 Metro Exodus
12
14.1
2019 World War Z
27
30.9
2019 Gears of War 5
18
20.6
2019 F1 2019
23
25.8
2019 GreedFall
20
23.2
2019 Borderlands 3
14
16.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
28
31.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
10
12.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
17
19.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
17
19.9
2018 Fallout 76
20
23.3
2018 Hitman 2
16
18.5
2018 Just Cause 4
18
20.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
19
22.0
2018 Strange Brigade
29
33.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
18
20.6
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
18
20.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
25
28.2
2017 For Honor
33
37.7
2017 Project CARS 2
24
26.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
29
32.3
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
15
17.1
2016 Hitman
25
27.9
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
22
25.3
2016 The Division
21
23.6
2016 Overwatch
28
31.2
2016 Dishonored 2
17
19.5
2015 DiRT Rally
40
44.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
24.4
2015 The Witcher 3
17
19.7
2015 Rocket League
98
109.9
2015 Need For Speed
27
30.5
2015 Project CARS
26
29.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
48
53.4
2014 Thief
28
31.9
2013 Bioshock Infinite
40
45.4
2013 Company of Heroes 2
24
27.5
2013 Crysis 3
23
25.6
2013 GRID 2
50
55.8
2013 Metro: Last Light
29
32.9
2013 Total War: Rome 2
28
31.5
2013 Battlefield 4
31
35.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
67
75.3
2009 League of Legends
127
141.4
2008 Crysis: Warhead
34
38.7

Resolución 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Yera Juego FotoGramas por segundo
2019 Apex Legends
14
18.4
2019 Anthem
10
12.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
14
18.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
17
21.4
2019 Metro Exodus
8
11.0
2019 World War Z
18
22.5
2019 Gears of War 5
11
14.9
2019 F1 2019
14
18.2
2019 GreedFall
13
16.8
2019 Borderlands 3
9
11.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
18
22.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
7
9.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
11
14.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
13
17.1
2018 Hitman 2
9
11.7
2018 Just Cause 4
12
15.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
12
15.4
2018 Strange Brigade
18
23.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
12
15.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
10
12.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
16
20.5
2017 For Honor
17
22.0
2017 Project CARS 2
15
18.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
23
29.2
2016 Overwatch
17
21.6
2016 Dishonored 2
13
16.7
2015 Rocket League
37
47.1
2015 Need For Speed
18
23.5
2015 Project CARS
17
22.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
27
34.6
2014 Thief
17
21.8
2013 Bioshock Infinite
22
28.4
2013 Company of Heroes 2
14
18.4
2013 Crysis 3
20
25.1
2013 GRID 2
32
40.4
2013 Metro: Last Light
21
27.1
2013 Total War: Rome 2
16
20.3
2013 Battlefield 4
17
21.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
50
62.8
2009 League of Legends
62
78.5
2008 Crysis: Warhead
20
25.5

Resolución 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Yera Juego FotoGramas por segundo
2019 Apex Legends
7
11.0
2019 Anthem
4
6.9
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
6
9.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
10.5
2019 Metro Exodus
4
7.0
2019 World War Z
9
12.9
2019 Gears of War 5
6
9.4
2019 F1 2019
8
11.6
2019 GreedFall
4
6.9
2019 Borderlands 3
4
6.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
9
13.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
4
6.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
6
9.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
7
11.0
2018 Hitman 2
4
6.9
2018 Just Cause 4
5
7.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
7.4
2018 Strange Brigade
8
12.5
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
6
8.9
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
5
7.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
9
14.1
2017 For Honor
7
11.0
2017 Project CARS 2
10
15.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
17
24.5
2016 Overwatch
7
11.1
2016 Dishonored 2
9
13.1
2015 Rocket League
15
21.9
2015 Need For Speed
10
15.7
2015 Project CARS
10
15.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
11
16.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
39
56.5
2009 League of Legends
22
31.5
R9 M280X with i7-4960X at 1080p and Ultra calidad settings
R9 M280X with i7-4960X at 1440p and Ultra calidad settings
R9 M280X with i7-4960X at 4K and Ultra calidad settings

Compare contra competidores

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Especificaciones

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Discusión y Comentarios

Comparte tus comentarios