R9 M280X med FX-8350 Eight-Core benchmarks på Høj kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger

Med hensyn til omkostninger, er prissætningen klart et reelt spørgsmål her, og prisen R9 M280X på er simpelthen latterligt. Denne kombination mellem R9 M280X og AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core har mindre end 8% flaskehals i mange spil og er perfekt match for at undgå fps tab. Denne kombination mellem R9 M280X og AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core er et perfekt match for at undgå fps tab. Med den 4096 nuværende MB RAM, R9 M280X kan det have meget få Hukommelse-relaterede flaskehalse i mere moderne spil.

 R9 M280X med FX-8350 Eight-Core benchmarks på Høj kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Pris kr 7,029.9
År 2015
Maksimal indspillet temperatur 66C
Max blæserstøj 52.8dB
Anbefalet strømforsyning 70W
Benchmark CPU AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core ($79.99) *closest mobile equivalent*
CPU indvirkning på FPS -6.4 FPS
CPU indvirkning på FPS% -20.0%
Indstillinger for benchmark-kvalitet High Quality Settings
Gennemsnitlig 1080p-ydeevne 56.6 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 1440p ydeevne 34.8 FPS
Gennemsnitlig 4K-ydeevne 17.7 FPS
Hukommelse 4 GB
1080p Pris pr. Ramme kr 325.5
1440p Pris pr. Ramme kr 444.9
4K pris pr. Ramme kr 808.0
Serie R9 M280X
popover.html 41/100 Acceptabelt

Spillets ydeevne Høj kvalitet under indstillinger

Ændre kvalitetsindstillinger

Opløsning 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
39
53.7
2019 Anthem
34
47.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
38
52.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
43
59.0
2019 Metro Exodus
33
45.7
2019 World War Z
43
58.3
2019 Gears of War 5
37
50.5
2019 F1 2019
40
54.5
2019 GreedFall
38
52.5
2019 Borderlands 3
35
47.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
43
58.7
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
32
44.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
36
49.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
37
50.0
2018 Fallout 76
38
52.6
2018 Hitman 2
36
49.0
2018 Just Cause 4
37
50.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
38
51.7
2018 Strange Brigade
44
60.0
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
37
50.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
37
50.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
41
56.3
2017 For Honor
46
63.5
2017 Project CARS 2
40
55.1
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
43
59.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
35
48.0
2016 Hitman
41
56.1
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
40
54.1
2016 The Division
39
52.8
2016 Overwatch
43
58.5
2016 Dishonored 2
36
49.7
2015 DiRT Rally
50
68.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
39
53.4
2015 The Witcher 3
36
49.9
2015 Rocket League
87
118.0
2015 Need For Speed
42
58.0
2015 Project CARS
42
57.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
55
75.3
2014 Thief
43
59.1
2013 Bioshock Infinite
51
69.3
2013 Company of Heroes 2
41
55.8
2013 Crysis 3
40
54.3
2013 GRID 2
57
77.2
2013 Metro: Last Light
44
59.9
2013 Total War: Rome 2
43
58.8
2013 Battlefield 4
45
61.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
68
91.9
2009 League of Legends
104
141.8
2008 Crysis: Warhead
47
64.2

Opløsning 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
24
32.9
2019 Anthem
21
28.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
24
32.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
25
35.1
2019 Metro Exodus
20
27.3
2019 World War Z
26
36.0
2019 Gears of War 5
22
30.2
2019 F1 2019
24
32.8
2019 GreedFall
23
31.7
2019 Borderlands 3
20
27.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
26
36.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
19
26.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
22
30.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
23
32.0
2018 Hitman 2
20
27.8
2018 Just Cause 4
22
30.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
22
30.6
2018 Strange Brigade
26
36.4
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
22
30.9
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
21
28.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
25
34.5
2017 For Honor
26
35.7
2017 Project CARS 2
24
33.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
30
41.1
2016 Overwatch
26
35.3
2016 Dishonored 2
23
31.6
2015 Rocket League
40
54.6
2015 Need For Speed
27
36.8
2015 Project CARS
26
35.9
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
33
45.1
2014 Thief
26
35.5
2013 Bioshock Infinite
29
40.5
2013 Company of Heroes 2
24
32.9
2013 Crysis 3
28
37.9
2013 GRID 2
36
49.5
2013 Metro: Last Light
29
39.5
2013 Total War: Rome 2
25
34.3
2013 Battlefield 4
26
35.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
49
66.4
2009 League of Legends
57
78.3
2008 Crysis: Warhead
28
38.2

Opløsning 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
År Spil Billeder pr. sekund
2019 Apex Legends
12
17.3
2019 Anthem
9
14.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
11
16.3
2019 Resident Evil 2
11
16.9
2019 Metro Exodus
10
14.3
2019 World War Z
13
18.8
2019 Gears of War 5
11
16.1
2019 F1 2019
12
17.7
2019 GreedFall
9
14.2
2019 Borderlands 3
9
13.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
13
19.2
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
9
13.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
11
16.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
12
17.3
2018 Hitman 2
9
14.2
2018 Just Cause 4
10
14.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
10
14.6
2018 Strange Brigade
12
18.5
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
10
15.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
10
14.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
13
19.7
2017 For Honor
12
17.3
2017 Project CARS 2
14
20.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
19
27.5
2016 Overwatch
12
17.4
2016 Dishonored 2
13
18.9
2015 Rocket League
17
25.6
2015 Need For Speed
14
20.8
2015 Project CARS
14
20.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
14
21.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
36
51.7
2009 League of Legends
22
32.8
R9 M280X with FX-8350 Eight-Core at 1080p and Høj kvalitet settings
R9 M280X with FX-8350 Eight-Core at 1440p and Høj kvalitet settings
R9 M280X with FX-8350 Eight-Core at 4K and Høj kvalitet settings

Sammenlign mod konkurrenter

setupad-728x90.html

R9 M280X Specifikationer

R9 M280X Board Design

OutputsNo outputs
TDPunknown

R9 M280X Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1000 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 M280X Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationCrystal System (R9 M200)
ProductionActive
Release DateFeb 5th, 2015

R9 M280X Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2.0
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.3
Vulkan1.1.101

R9 M280X Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Die Size160 mm²
FoundryTSMC
GPU NameSaturn
GPU VariantSaturn XT
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,080 million

R9 M280X Memory

Bandwidth88.00 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 M280X Render Config

Compute Units14
L1 Cache16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache256 KB
ROPs16
Shading Units896
TMUs56

R9 M280X Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1.792 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance128.0 GFLOPS (1:14)
Pixel Rate16.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate56.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews


Diskussion og kommentarer

Del dine kommentarer